These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22633598)

  • 21. A three-appointment alternative treatment protocol for fabricating an implant-supported milled bar overdenture.
    Lin WS; Ozdemir E; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 22304740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impression materials.
    Doubleday B
    Br J Orthod; 1998 May; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 9668998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An alternate pressure-free functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 20553174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
    Raviv E; Hanna J; Raviv R; Harel-Raviv M
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of interarch space for implant restorations in edentulous patients: a laboratory technique.
    AbuJamra NF; Stavridakis MM; Miller RB
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Jun; 9(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 11070139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modified fluid wax impression for a severely resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge.
    Tan KM; Singer MT; Masri R; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 19328281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Impression technics in complete removable dentures].
    Domken O; Chichoyan F; Prapotnich R
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):216-33. PubMed ID: 16193854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.
    Stimmelmayr M; Erdelt K; Güth JF; Happe A; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 22009182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modified indexing technique for the immediate interim restoration of a dental implant.
    Reis JM; Abi-Rached Fde O; Scardueli CR; Pinelli LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 24433838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New delivery method offers improved outlook on impression-taking.
    Pace SL
    Dent Assist; 2009; 78(3):8, 10, 45. PubMed ID: 19585789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.