These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2263933)

  • 1. [The wear on enamel, amalgam and their enamel antagonists in a computer-controlled mastication simulator].
    Krejci I; Heinzmann JL; Lutz F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(11):1285-91. PubMed ID: 2263933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8008818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator].
    Krejci I; Reich T; Lutz F; Albertoni M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(8):953-60. PubMed ID: 2399447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 May; 22(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7616345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Apr; 22(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 7769526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface wear on cervical restorations and adjacent enamel and root cementum caused by simulated long-term maintenance therapy.
    Rühling A; Wulf J; Schwahn C; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 15016258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear.
    Krejci I; Albert P; Lutz F
    J Dent Res; 1999 Feb; 78(2):713-9. PubMed ID: 10029471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel.
    Ratledge DK; Smith BG; Wilson RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 7932268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 16316798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 20830885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps.
    Lutz F; Krejci I; Barbakow F
    J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 71(8):1525-9. PubMed ID: 1506518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear].
    Schmidlin PR; Pasqualetti T; Imfeld T; Besek M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.