These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study. Shannon A Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays. Moscovich H; Creugers NH; De Kanter RJ; Roeters FJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9855856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The lighter side of "bread-and-butter dentistry". Berland L; Williams A Dent Today; 2004 Jun; 23(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 15218672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Are there alternatives to dental amalgam? Christensen GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Mar; 122(3):77. PubMed ID: 2019692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In-Ceram, a combination of strength and aesthetics, with a bonding dilemma. Marais JT; Herbst D J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Feb; 51(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 9461865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Retention of amalgam restorations: undercuts versus bonding. Staninec M Quintessence Int; 1989 May; 20(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 2667020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Lange RT; Pfeiffer P Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]