These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2264013)

  • 61. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings.
    Vann WF; Barkmeier WW; Mahler DB
    J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):876-9. PubMed ID: 2966821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy.
    Mjör IA; Toffenetti F
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 1437695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [A retrospective in vivo study of Sonicsys approx restorations].
    Hugo B; Otto A; Stassinakis A; Hofmann N; Klaiber B
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2001; 111(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11407330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations.
    Wilder AD; May KN; Bayne SC; Taylor DF; Leinfelder KF
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10825870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Implementation and experience of a new method for posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite restorations in the private practice--a survey.
    Tauböck TT; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jul; 70(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 21793644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Clinical behavior of posterior restorations with composite resins].
    Skouta M; Kakaboura A
    Stomatologia (Athenai); 1991; 47(5-6):296-305. PubMed ID: 1949095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities.
    Van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 16430017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods.
    Heintze SD; Faouzi M; Rousson V; Ozcan M
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):961-73. PubMed ID: 22698644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/ self-etching restorative system: three-year findings.
    Wilson NH; Gordan VV; Brunton PA; Wilson MA; Crisp RJ; Mjör IA
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Feb; 8(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16536345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Posterior composite resins. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 112(5):707-9. PubMed ID: 3458787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Comparison between two procion dyes and alizarin red to assess marginal leakage in resin restorations. A laboratory study.
    Gage JP; Clarke DF
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Apr; 36(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 1877911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Three-year occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Freilich MA; Goldberg AJ; Gilpatrick RO; Simonsen RJ
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jul; 8(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 1345041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years.
    Freilich MA; Goldberg AJ; Gilpatrick RO; Simonsen RJ
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jan; 8(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 1521686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A 5-year study comparing a posterior composite resin and an amalgam.
    Norman RD; Wright JS; Rydberg RJ; Felkner LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Nov; 64(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 2090809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Proximo-occlusal composite restorations in primary molars: marginal adaptation, bacterial penetration, and pulpal reactions.
    Varpio M; Warfvinge J; Norén JG
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Jun; 48(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 2195839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations.
    Huysmans MC; van der Varst PG
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 8621047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Evaluation of wear property of Giomer and universal composite
    Mu HL; Tian FC; Wang XY; Gao XJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 33550345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
    Demarco FF; Collares K; Correa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Aug; 31(suppl 1):e56. PubMed ID: 28902236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Two-year evaluation in vivo and in vitro of Class 2 composites.
    Fuks AB; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(6):219-23. PubMed ID: 2095534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.
    Lempel E; Tóth Á; Fábián T; Krajczár K; Szalma J
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25480695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.