These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2264013)

  • 81. Gradual increases in marginal leakage of resin composite restorations with thermal stress.
    Momoi Y; Iwase H; Nakano Y; Kohno A; Asanuma A; Yanagisawa K
    J Dent Res; 1990 Oct; 69(10):1659-63. PubMed ID: 2212210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    da Veiga AM; Cunha AC; Ferreira DM; da Silva Fidalgo TK; Chianca TK; Reis KR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():1-12. PubMed ID: 27523636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [In vivo adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on amalgam and composite restorative materials].
    Günyakti N; Gür G; Misirligil A
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1990 Jan; 17(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 2104062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report.
    Raskin A; Michotte-Theall B; Vreven J; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 1999 Jan; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 9922607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Risk factors for caries development on tooth surfaces adjacent to newly placed class II composites--a pragmatic, practice based study.
    Kopperud SE; Espelid I; Tveit AB; Skudutyte-Rysstad R
    J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1323-9. PubMed ID: 26327559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Cure profiles of visible-light-cured Class II composite restorations in vivo and in vitro.
    Lundin SA; Koch G
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jan; 8(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 1521688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The survival and clinical performance of anterior composite resin restorations and posterior indirect and cast restorations used to treat generalised tooth wear.
    Shah S; Hemmings K; Gulamali A; Petrie A; Malik JS
    Br Dent J; 2024 Aug; 237(3):203-211. PubMed ID: 39123028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Clinical evaluation of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students of Kuwait University.
    Al-Samhan A; Al-Enezi H; Alomari Q
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 20516707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Microhardness of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions.
    Kays BT; Sneed WD; Nuckles DB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):487-90. PubMed ID: 2066884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. A protocol for successful posterior composite restorations.
    Coker HB
    J Ala Dent Assoc; 1992; 76(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 1527275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth - Retrospective study up to 13 years.
    Lempel E; Lovász BV; Bihari E; Krajczár K; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
    Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1308-1318. PubMed ID: 31278018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Three-year clinical evaluation of a self-cured posterior composite resin.
    Brunson WD; Bayne SC; Shurdevant JR; Roberson TM; Wilder AD; Taylor DF
    Dent Mater; 1989 Mar; 5(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2691302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. A prospective study of the survival of chemically activated anterior resin composite restorations in general dental practice: 5-year results.
    van Noort R; Davis LG
    J Dent; 1993 Aug; 21(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 8354745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Good short-term survival rates for posterior resin composite restorations.
    Chauhan R
    Evid Based Dent; 2015 Dec; 16(4):114-5. PubMed ID: 26680522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Class II Resin Composites: Restorative Options.
    Patel M; Mehta SB; Banerji S
    Dent Update; 2015 Oct; 42(8):721-2, 725-6, 728-30 passim. PubMed ID: 26685471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. The effects of mechanical loading on marginal integrity of composite restorations.
    Stewart GP; Balda BA; Norman RD
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):151-2. PubMed ID: 3527830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear.
    Peters MC; Delong R; Pintado MR; Pallesen U; Qvist V; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 1999 Sep; 27(7):479-85. PubMed ID: 10507203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Five-year clinical study of u.v.-polymerized posterior composites.
    Wilder AD; Bayne SC; May KN; Leinfelder KF; Taylor DF
    J Dent; 1991 Aug; 19(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1787209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Challenges to teaching posterior composites in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2006 Dec; 201(12):747-50. PubMed ID: 17183386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Quantitative evaluation of proximal contacts in posterior composite restorations. Part I. Methodology.
    Wang JC; Hong JM
    Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Jul; 5(7):404-8. PubMed ID: 2810447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.