These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2264016)

  • 41. Selective-pressure single impression procedure for tooth-mucosa-supported removable partial dentures.
    Dumbrigue HB; Esquivel JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 9710833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A cross-over Randomised Controlled Trial of selective pressure impressions for lower complete dentures.
    Hyde TP; Craddock HL; Blance A; Brunton PA
    J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):853-8. PubMed ID: 20637826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Simple and functional--an impression method for the distal extension RPD.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Jun; 21(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 19663052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impression technique for partially edentulous patients.
    Nissan J; Barnea E; Krauze E; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 12239486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relationship between various functional impression techniques and different operators.
    Ulusoy M; Can G; Aydin AK; Türköz Y; Akgök V
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1996 Sep; 2(2-3):540-5. PubMed ID: 9569813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures made from impressions with different materials.
    Hochman N; Yaniv O
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 Feb; 19(2):200-2, 204-6. PubMed ID: 9656866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical outcome of the altered cast impression procedure compared with use of a one-piece cast.
    Frank RP; Brudvik JS; Noonan CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):468-76. PubMed ID: 15153855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impression techniques for attachment-retained distal extension removable partial dentures.
    Preiskel HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Jun; 25(6):620-8. PubMed ID: 4929960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality of materials supplied to dental laboratories for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Ireland.
    Lynch CD; Allen PF
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 14737795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique.
    Abuasi HA; Wassell RW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Microbiological findings on Vikopres paste after functional impressions of the upper jaw].
    Teodosijević M; Nanusević O; Joković B; Miljković Z; Draganjac M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 1996; 53(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 9229945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Distal extension partial dentures: a rationale for stability.
    Wong TF
    J Hawaii Dent Assoc; 1978 Sep; 10(5):9-13. PubMed ID: 385714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Precise mucostatic primary impression taking in the edentulous mandible. Hemi-arch method].
    Landé A
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1991 Mar; 45(173):93-9. PubMed ID: 1853750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Immediate denture impression technique using zinc-oxide and eugenol and rubber base impression material.
    Chaney SA
    Dent J; 1977 Mar; 43(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 323026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Randomised Controlled Study Comparing the Anterior Mandibular Labio-Lingual Neutral Zone Position in Edentulous Subjects With and Without Their Maxillary Denture In-Situ.
    Birtles A; Craddock H; Kang J; Hyde TP
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Jun; 23(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26373201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.