These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22640436)

  • 1. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
    Ogutu JO; Schulz-Streeck T; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 22640436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection.
    Ogutu JO; Piepho HP; Schulz-Streeck T
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S11. PubMed ID: 21624167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regularized group regression methods for genomic prediction: Bridge, MCP, SCAD, group bridge, group lasso, sparse group lasso, group MCP and group SCAD.
    Ogutu JO; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2014; 8(Suppl 5):S7. PubMed ID: 25519521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of analyses of the XVth QTLMAS common dataset III: Genomic Estimations of Breeding Values.
    Le Roy P; Filangi O; Demeure O; Elsen JM
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3. PubMed ID: 22640599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-selection of markers for genomic selection.
    Schulz-Streeck T; Ogutu JO; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S12. PubMed ID: 21624168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of five methods for genomic breeding value estimation for the common dataset of the 15th QTL-MAS Workshop.
    Wang CL; Ma PP; Zhang Z; Ding XD; Liu JF; Fu WX; Weng ZQ; Zhang Q
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. PubMed ID: 22640547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individuals.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 21624176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic Selection for Predicting Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in a Wheat Breeding Program.
    Arruda MP; Brown PJ; Lipka AE; Krill AM; Thurber C; Kolb FL
    Plant Genome; 2015 Nov; 8(3):eplantgenome2015.01.0003. PubMed ID: 33228272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. LASSO with cross-validation for genomic selection.
    Usai MG; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Dec; 91(6):427-36. PubMed ID: 20122298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic breeding value prediction using three Bayesian methods and application to reduced density marker panels.
    Cleveland MA; Forni S; Deeb N; Maltecca C
    BMC Proc; 2010; 4(Suppl 1 Proceedings of the 13th European workshop on QTL map):S6. PubMed ID: 20380760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.
    Zhong S; Dekkers JC; Fernando RL; Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2009 May; 182(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 19299342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.
    Habier D; Tetens J; Seefried FR; Lichtner P; Thaller G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Feb; 42(1):5. PubMed ID: 20170500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection for QTL-MAS data using a trait-specific relationship matrix.
    Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; de Koning DJ; Zhang Q
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S15. PubMed ID: 21624171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the Performance of Frequentist and Bayesian Techniques in Genomic Evaluation.
    Sahebalam H; Gholizadeh M; Hafezian H
    Biochem Genet; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38951354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2389-97. PubMed ID: 18073436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.