These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22640674)

  • 1. Treatment effects of intrusion arches and mini-implant systems in deepbite patients.
    Senışık NE; Türkkahraman H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):723-33. PubMed ID: 22640674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
    Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrusion of maxillary incisors by mini-screw anchorage of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion cases.
    Al-Falahi BA; Hammad SM; El-Kenawy MH; Fouda MA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 23413639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary Incisor Intrusion Using Two Conventional Intrusion Arches and Mini Implants: A Prospective Study.
    Shakti P; Ani GS; Peter E; Haider K; Kumar J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):907-913. PubMed ID: 34753843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.
    Deguchi T; Murakami T; Kuroda S; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):654-60. PubMed ID: 18456138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deepbite correction with incisor intrusion in adults: a long-term cephalometric study.
    Kale Varlık S; Onur Alpakan Ö; Türköz Ç
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):414-9. PubMed ID: 23992814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous Intrusion and Retraction of Maxillary Incisors with a Three Piece Intrusion Arch and Mini-screw Implants: A Case Report.
    Shah A; Araujo E
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016 Summer; 27(2):43-46. PubMed ID: 29799702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of mandibular incisor intrusion obtained using a conventional utility arch vs bone anchorage.
    Aydoğdu E; Özsoy ÖP
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 21469970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrusion of Lower Incisors in Deep Overbite Cases with Mini-screws.
    Alaa-Eldin AM; Salem AS; Fouda MA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27319038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the intrusive effects of miniscrews and utility arches.
    Polat-Özsoy Ö; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Veziroğlu F; Çetinşahin A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 21457864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with multiloop edgewise arch wire and modified Class III elastics by maxillary mini-implant anchorage.
    He S; Gao J; Wamalwa P; Wang Y; Zou S; Chen S
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):630-40. PubMed ID: 23311602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of pulpal blood flow during incisor intrusion.
    Sabuncuoglu FA; Ersahan S
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 26999890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of treatment outcomes in patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion by applying different anchorage methods: a three-dimensional model study].
    Ning M; Weiran L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 33(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 25872301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants.
    Paccini JV; Cotrim-Ferreira FA; Ferreira FV; Freitas KM; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):56-66. PubMed ID: 27409654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in maxillary incisor dental pulp blood flow during intrusion by mini-implants.
    Sabuncuoglu FA; Ersahan S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):489-96. PubMed ID: 24438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient.
    Kim TW; Kim H; Lee SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 17110268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint.
    Scheffler NR; Proffit WR; Phillips C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 25439210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.