201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22640682)
1. Construction of orthodontic setup models on a computer.
Kihara T; Tanimoto K; Michida M; Yoshimi Y; Nagasaki T; Murayama T; Tanne K; Nikawa H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 22640682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Weissheimer A; Pham J; Go L; de Menezes LM; Redmond WR; Loos JF; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 25533080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reliability of the expected root position setup methodology to evaluate root position during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Pi S; Park J; Devgon D; Nelson G; Hatcher D; Oberoi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):583-595. PubMed ID: 30268268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Lightheart KG; English JD; Kau CH; Akyalcin S; Bussa HI; McGrory KR; McGrory KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 22640670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generating an Ideal Virtual Setup with Three-Dimensional Crowns and Roots.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Weissheimer A; Tong H
J Clin Orthod; 2015 Nov; 49(11):696-700. PubMed ID: 26684842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A three-dimensional setup model with dental roots.
Guo H; Zhou J; Bai Y; Li S
J Clin Orthod; 2011 Apr; 45(4):209-16; quiz 235-6. PubMed ID: 21785205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
Tong H; Enciso R; Van Elslande D; Major PW; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.
Macchi A; Carrafiello G; Cacciafesta V; Norcini A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 16679200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A pilot study of root position in orthodontic diagnosis model set-up].
Hou Y; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Wang S; Liu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 50(10):631-5. PubMed ID: 26757636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance.
Grauer D; Proffit WR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 21889089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional prediction of roots position through cone-beam computed tomography scans-digital model superimposition: A novel method.
Staderini E; Guglielmi F; Cornelis MA; Cattaneo PM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 Feb; 22(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30449070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of dental and basal arch forms using cone-beam CT and 3D virtual models of normal occlusion.
Bayome M; Park JH; Han SH; Baek SH; Sameshima GT; Kook YA
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 23785937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models.
Bae MJ; Kim JY; Park JT; Cha JY; Kim HJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 23726340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
