These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22640992)
41. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age. Randleman JB J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The peer review process (aka peer reviewology). Yucha CB Biol Res Nurs; 2002 Oct; 4(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 12408212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The finer points of writing and refereeing scientific articles. Bain BJ; Littlewood TJ; Szydlo RM Br J Haematol; 2016 Feb; 172(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 26754408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The rush to publish. Ronai Z Pigment Cell Melanoma Res; 2011 Oct; 24(5):873. PubMed ID: 21981930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The contemporary landscape of journal publishing. McKenna L Collegian; 2016; 23(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 27188033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism. Wittmaack K Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record. Beall J Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7607):326. PubMed ID: 27306178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review. Scarfe WC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers. Pearson H Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Launch of the World Association of Medical Editors. JAMA; 1995 Apr; 273(13):981. PubMed ID: 7897803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Peer review should continue after publication. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Peer review and refereeing in science. Lore W East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Editorial: onward and upward with PCMR. Arnheiter H; Bosenberg M; Kelsh R Pigment Cell Melanoma Res; 2013 Jan; 26(1):1. PubMed ID: 23253860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [The process of external peer review of manuscripts submitted for publication to Enfermería Clínica]. Moreno-Casbas T; Fuentelsaz-Gallego C; Ruzafa-Martínez M; Puigblanqué-Reyes E Enferm Clin; 2008; 18(5):229-31. PubMed ID: 18840330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process. Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [How to reward and stimulate the task of reviewing scientific articles?]. Muccioli C; Campos M; Goldchmit M; Dantas PE; Bechara SJ; Costa VP Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):5. PubMed ID: 17505710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]