235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22641975)
1. Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in critically ill patients: comparison of CW-Doppler ultrasound cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) and thermodilution (PiCCO).
Horster S; Stemmler HJ; Sparrer J; Tischer J; Hausmann A; Geiger S
Acta Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 67(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 22641975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Thermodilution-Derived Right Ventricular Parameters in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.
Cherpanath TG; Lagrand WK; Binnekade JM; Schneider AJ; Schultz MJ; Groeneveld JA
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):632-8. PubMed ID: 26703971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO.
Horster S; Stemmler HJ; Strecker N; Brettner F; Hausmann A; Cnossen J; Parhofer KG; Nickel T; Geiger S
Crit Care Res Pract; 2012; 2012():270631. PubMed ID: 22191019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ultrasound cardiac output monitor and thermodilution for cardiac function monitoring in critical patients: a Meta-analysis].
Zhang Y; Wang Y; Ji D; Qian J; Xu J; Shi J
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1462-1468. PubMed ID: 32029030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients.
Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS
Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography for cardiac output in critically ill patients: A pilot study of ultrasound versus the thermodilution method.
Hammoudi N; Hékimian G; Laveau F; Achkar M; Isnard R; Combes A
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Jan; 110(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 28017278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive cardiac output assessment in critically ill paediatric patients.
Wongsirimetheekul T; Khositseth A; Lertbunrian R
Acta Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 69(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24783468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement.
Knirsch W; Kretschmar O; Tomaske M; Stutz K; Nagdyman N; Balmer C; Schmitz A; Béttex D; Berger F; Bauersfeld U; Weiss M
Intensive Care Med; 2008 Jun; 34(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 18297271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume Assessments by Transthoracic Echocardiography and Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor in Critically ill Adult Patients: A Comparative Study.
Gomes FKA; Fagundes AAP; Amorim FF
J Intensive Care Med; 2024 Apr; 39(4):341-348. PubMed ID: 37769347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in heart failure subjects on circulatory support.
Phillips R; Lichtenthal P; Sloniger J; Burstow D; West M; Copeland J
Anesth Analg; 2009 Mar; 108(3):881-6. PubMed ID: 19224797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of cardiac output during mechanical ventilation by electrical bioimpedance or thermodilution in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure.
Genoni M; Pelosi P; Romand JA; Pedoto A; Moccetti T; Malacrida R
Crit Care Med; 1998 Aug; 26(8):1441-5. PubMed ID: 9710107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Chand R; Mehta Y; Trehan N
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2006 Jun; 20(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 16750729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.
Beltramo F; Menteer J; Razavi A; Khemani RG; Szmuszkovicz J; Newth CJ; Ross PA
Pediatr Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 26364291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.
McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults.
Zhang J; Critchley LA; Lee DC; Khaw KS; Lee SW
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 26873749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients.
Bendjelid K; Marx G; Kiefer N; Simon TP; Geisen M; Hoeft A; Siegenthaler N; Hofer CK
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 111(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 23625132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.
Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers.
Squara P; Rotcajg D; Denjean D; Estagnasie P; Brusset A
Crit Care; 2009; 13(4):R125. PubMed ID: 19638227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
