These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22642549)
21. Validity assessment of the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy module of the LapVision virtual reality simulator. Miyata H; Abe T; Hotta K; Higuchi M; Osawa T; Matsumoto R; Kikuchi H; Kurashima Y; Murai S; Shinohara N Surg Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 2(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 33981981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of Continuous Motion Parameter Feedback on Laparoscopic Simulation Training: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Skill Acquisition and Retention. Buescher JF; Mehdorn AS; Neumann PA; Becker F; Eichelmann AK; Pankratius U; Bahde R; Foell D; Senninger N; Rijcken E J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):516-526. PubMed ID: 28864265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. Salkini MW; Doarn CR; Kiehl N; Broderick TJ; Donovan JF; Gaitonde K J Endourol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 20059385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator. Sherman V; Feldman LS; Stanbridge D; Kazmi R; Fried GM Surg Endosc; 2005 May; 19(5):678-82. PubMed ID: 15776208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transferability of laparoscopic skills using the virtual reality simulator. Yang C; Kalinitschenko U; Helmert JR; Weitz J; Reissfelder C; Mees ST Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4132-4137. PubMed ID: 29602986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment on video: 8-year results of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in Japan. Matsuda T; Kanayama H; Ono Y; Kawauchi A; Mizoguchi H; Nakagawa K; Iwamura M; Shigeta M; Habuchi T; Terachi T; J Endourol; 2014 Nov; 28(11):1374-8. PubMed ID: 24819163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons. Escamirosa FP; Flores RM; García IO; Vidal CR; Martínez AM Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3392-403. PubMed ID: 25515985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized educational trial. Oestergaard J; Bjerrum F; Maagaard M; Winkel P; Larsen CR; Ringsted C; Gluud C; Grantcharov T; Ottesen B; Soerensen JL BMC Med Educ; 2012 Feb; 12():7. PubMed ID: 22373062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Thompson JR; Leonard AC; Doarn CR; Roesch MJ; Broderick TJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1107-14. PubMed ID: 20872023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Value of laparoscopic virtual reality simulator in laparoscopic suture ability training of catechumen]. Cai JL; Zhang Y; Sun GF; Li NC; Zhang XH; Na YQ Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1096-8. PubMed ID: 23336487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Porcine cadaver organ or virtual-reality simulation training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Van Bruwaene S; Schijven MP; Napolitano D; De Win G; Miserez M J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 25555673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course]. Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Schreuder HW; van Dongen KW; Roeleveld SJ; Schijven MP; Broeders IA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):540.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19285646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition. Loukas C; Nikiteas N; Schizas D; Lahanas V; Georgiou E Surg Endosc; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2550-8. PubMed ID: 22476832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial. Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator. Iwata N; Fujiwara M; Kodera Y; Tanaka C; Ohashi N; Nakayama G; Koike M; Nakao A Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 20585960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training. Schmidt MW; Kowalewski KF; Schmidt ML; Wennberg E; Garrow CR; Paik S; Benner L; Schijven MP; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2093-2103. PubMed ID: 30327918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface. Chaudhry A; Sutton C; Wood J; Stone R; McCloy R Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Jul; 81(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10615201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists. Mohtashami F; von Dadelszen P; Allaire C JSLS; 2011; 15(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 21985726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]