These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22643022)
21. Implementation and Outcomes of a Faculty-Based, Peer Review Manuscript Writing Workshop. Kulage KM; Larson EL J Prof Nurs; 2016; 32(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 27424926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals. Jawaid SA Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S21-5. PubMed ID: 14968187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts. Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome M West J Nurs Res; 2011 Jun; 33(4):506-21. PubMed ID: 21078915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996. Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group. Steinert Y; McLeod PJ; Liben S; Snell L Med Teach; 2008; 30(8):e280-5. PubMed ID: 18946816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Submission of scientifically sound and ethical manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals - a reviewer's personal perspective on bioanalytical publications. Weng N Biomed Chromatogr; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1457-60. PubMed ID: 22987619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors. Flanagin A Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? Morton JP Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How to build a scientific publishing career based on hundreds of letters-to-the-editor: "The Art of Loss". Neghina R; Neghina AM Account Res; 2011; 18(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 21707416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.]. Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Going Beyond "Not Enough Time": Barriers to Preparing Manuscripts for Academic Medical Journals. Oshiro J; Caubet SL; Viola KE; Huber JM Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 31530189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Bordage G Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96. PubMed ID: 11553504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The pattern of publishing previously rejected articles in selected journals. Whitman N; Eyre S Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 3843082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Manuscript Development and Publishing: A 5-Step Approach. Downey SM; Geraci SA Am J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 353(2):132-136. PubMed ID: 28183413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Gasparyan AY; Ayvazyan L; Blackmore H; Kitas GD Rheumatol Int; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1409-17. PubMed ID: 21800117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles]. Shashok K Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Writing biomedical manuscripts part I: fundamentals and general rules. Ohwovoriole AE West Afr J Med; 2011; 30(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 22120477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]