These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22643403)

  • 1. Direct precipitation on demand at large Scandinavian WWTPs reduces the effluent phosphorus load.
    Mattsson A; Nivert G; Heinonen M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(12):2106-11. PubMed ID: 22643403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing the total discharge from a large WWTP by separate treatment of primary effluent overflow.
    Hanner N; Mattsson A; Gruvberger C; Nyberg U; Aspegren H; Fredriksson O; Nordqvist A; Andersson B
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):157-62. PubMed ID: 15553471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the domestic specific loads of two wastewater plants of the Paris conurbation (France) with contrasted treatments: a step for exploring the effects of the application of the European Directive.
    Garnier J; Laroche L; Pinault S
    Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(17):3257-66. PubMed ID: 16949125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pollution based real time control of wastewater systems.
    Risholt LP; Schilling W; Erbe V; Alex J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11902473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of primary sedimentation on full-scale WWTP nutrient removal performance.
    Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Flameling AG; Colprim J; Meijer SC
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3375-84. PubMed ID: 20430413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of impacts of treated wastewater to the Krka river, Slovenia.
    Cotman M; Zagorc-Koncan J; Droic A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(6):47-54. PubMed ID: 11700663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost and effluent quality controllers design based on the relative gain array for a nutrient removal WWTP.
    Machado VC; Gabriel D; Lafuente J; Baeza JA
    Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5129-41. PubMed ID: 19815250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aeration tank settling and real time control as a tool to improve the hydraulic capacity and treatment efficiency during wet weather: results from 7 years' full-scale operational data.
    Sharma AK; Guildal T; Thomsen HA; Mikkelsen PS; Jacobsen BN
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(10):2169-76. PubMed ID: 23676384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of an overland flow system for advanced treatment of wastewater plant effluent.
    Taebi A; Droste RL
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 17499907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants.
    Oliveira SC; Von Sperling M
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):1182-94. PubMed ID: 17897694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic optimisation of WWTP inflow to reduce total emission.
    Tränckner J; Franz T; Seggelke K; Krebs P
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):11-8. PubMed ID: 18048972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SHARON process evaluated for improved wastewater treatment plant nitrogen effluent quality.
    van Kempen R; ten Have CC; Meijer SC; Mulder JW; Duin JO; Uijterlinde CA; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):55-62. PubMed ID: 16235746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience from 10 years of full-scale operation with enhanced biological phosphorus removal at Oresundsverket.
    Tykesson E; Jönsson LE; la Cour Jansen J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):151-9. PubMed ID: 16477982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant by fuzzy control and neural network.
    Bongards M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(11):189-96. PubMed ID: 11443962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement strategy on enhanced biological phosphorus removal for municipal wastewater treatment plants: full-scale operating parameters, sludge activities, and microbial features.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Zhu J; Weiping L; Xin X
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4646-53. PubMed ID: 21306892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Start-up performance of a subsurface-flow constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment.
    Vanier SM; Dahab MF
    Environ Technol; 2001 May; 22(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 11424736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of AWT systems in the metro Atlanta area.
    Mines RO; Behrend GR; Holmes Bell G
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 70(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 15016439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.