203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22645040)
1. MR liver imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA: a delay time of 10 minutes is sufficient for lesion characterisation.
van Kessel CS; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA; van Leeuwen MS
Eur Radiol; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2153-60. PubMed ID: 22645040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR liver imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA: The need for different delay times of the hepatobiliary phase in patients with different liver function.
Liang M; Zhao J; Xie B; Li C; Yin X; Cheng L; Wang J; Zhang L
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 85(3):546-52. PubMed ID: 26860666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation between focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma].
Portilha MA; Pedro MT; Ruivo C; Semedo LC; Marques C; Alves FC
Acta Med Port; 2011 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():531-8. PubMed ID: 22849944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
Péporté AR; Sommer WH; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Zech CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):e101-6. PubMed ID: 23159401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography.
Tateyama A; Fukukura Y; Takumi K; Shindo T; Kumagae Y; Kamimura K; Nakajo M
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Nov; 18(43):6269-76. PubMed ID: 23180948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging.
Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Daldrup HE; Hesse T; Balzer T; Tombach B; Peters PE
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 9038130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peritoneal and pleural fluids may appear hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase using hepatobiliary MR contrast agents.
Ciolina M; Di Martino M; Bruno O; Pommier R; Vilgrain V; Ronot M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3020-3031. PubMed ID: 29374320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of enhancement patterns in focal solid liver lesions with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
Haimerl M; Wächtler M; Zeman F; Verloh N; Platzek I; Schreyer AG; Stroszczynski C; Wiggermann P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100315. PubMed ID: 24950259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Stern W; Schick F; Kopp AF; Reimer P; Shamsi K; Claussen CD; Laniado M
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10866081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Runge VM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(4):643-50. PubMed ID: 9676461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA, a new liver-specific magnetic resonance contrast agent. Kinetic and enhancement patterns in normal and cholestatic rats.
Clément O; Mühler A; Vexler V; Berthezène Y; Brasch RC
Invest Radiol; 1992 Aug; 27(8):612-9. PubMed ID: 1428739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium.
Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA (EOB·Primovist®) for low-field magnetic resonance imaging of canine focal liver lesions.
Yonetomi D; Kadosawa T; Miyoshi K; Nakao Y; Homma E; Hanazono K; Yamada E; Nakamura K; Ijiri A; Minegishi N; Maetani S; Hirayama K; Taniyama H; Nakade T
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 22548505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhotic liver enhancement using Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Frericks BB; Loddenkemper C; Huppertz A; Valdeig S; Stroux A; Seja M; Wolf KJ; Albrecht T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1053-60. PubMed ID: 19770329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions: a Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.
Ichikawa T; Saito K; Yoshioka N; Tanimoto A; Gokan T; Takehara Y; Kamura T; Gabata T; Murakami T; Ito K; Hirohashi S; Nishie A; Saito Y; Onaya H; Kuwatsuru R; Morimoto A; Ueda K; Kurauchi M; Breuer J
Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 20098330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI for focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions in pediatric cancer survivors.
Gu K; Jeon TY; Yoo SY; Kim JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32797310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primovist, Eovist: what to expect?
Van Beers BE; Pastor CM; Hussain HK
J Hepatol; 2012 Aug; 57(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 22504332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver in Mrp2-deficient rats using the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Saito S; Obata A; Kashiwagi Y; Abe K; Murase K
Invest Radiol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):548-53. PubMed ID: 23442774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers.
Brismar TB; Dahlstrom N; Edsborg N; Persson A; Smedby O; Albiin N
Acta Radiol; 2009 Sep; 50(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 19701821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
