217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22645382)
1. Mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for some polymers.
Kucuk N; Cakir M; Isitman NA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 22645382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculation of radiation attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for some building materials.
Damla N; Baltas H; Celik A; Kiris E; Cevik U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 22128356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining photon energy absorption parameters for different soil samples.
Kucuk N; Tumsavas Z; Cakir M
J Radiat Res; 2013 May; 54(3):578-86. PubMed ID: 23179375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of photon attenuation coefficient, porosity and field capacity of soil by gamma-ray transmission for 60, 356 and 662 keV gamma rays.
Demir D; Un A; Ozgül M; Sahin Y
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1834-7. PubMed ID: 18554919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Studies on effective atomic numbers, electron densities and mass attenuation coefficients in Au alloys.
Han I; Demir L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2010; 18(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 20421703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photon interaction parameters of dosimetric interest in bone.
Manjunatha HC; Rudraswamy B
Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 22850239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Studies on effective atomic number, electron density and kerma for some fatty acids and carbohydrates.
Manohara SR; Hanagodimath SM; Gerward L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):N377-86. PubMed ID: 18812646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Studies on effective atomic numbers, electron densities from mass attenuation coefficients near the K edge in some samarium compounds.
Akman F; Durak R; Turhan MF; Kaçal MR
Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Jul; 101():107-113. PubMed ID: 25880612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extracting atomic numbers and electron densities from a dual source dual energy CT scanner: experiments and a simulation model.
Landry G; Reniers B; Granton PV; van Rooijen B; Beaulieu L; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 21924780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating photon interaction coefficients from single energy x-ray CT.
Midgley SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(23):8079-98. PubMed ID: 23159870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gamma-ray attenuation properties of some NLO materials: potential use in dosimetry.
Al-Buriahi MS; Singh VP; Arslan H; Awasarmol VV; Tonguc BT
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2020 Mar; 59(1):145-150. PubMed ID: 31781839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An approximation for response function to gamma-rays of NaI(Tl) detectors up to 1.5 MeV.
Cengiz A
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 18486481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy response of CaSO4:Dy teflon TLD disk dosimeters to photons and electrons.
Sharada KS
Radiat Res; 1983 Jan; 93(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 6823508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy dependence of effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption and photon interaction: studies of some biological molecules in the energy range 1 keV-20 MeV.
Manohara SR; Hanagodimath SM; Gerward L
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):388-402. PubMed ID: 18293593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effective atomic number revisited in the light of modern photon-interaction cross-section databases.
Manohara SR; Hanagodimath SM; Thind KS; Gerward L
Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):784-7. PubMed ID: 19828324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are all photon radiations similar in large absorbers?--a comparison of electron spectra.
Kellerer AM; Roos H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15695239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of the effective atomic numbers of dosimetric materials for electrons, protons and alpha particles using a direct method in the energy region 10 keV-1 GeV: a comparative study.
Kurudirek M; Aksakal O; Akkuş T
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2015 Nov; 54(4):481-92. PubMed ID: 26082026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of effective atomic number and electron density for tissues from human organs in the energy range of 1 keV-100 GeV.
Manjunatha HC; Rudraswamy B
Health Phys; 2013 Feb; 104(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 23274818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of the x-ray mass energy-absorption coefficient of air using 3 keV to 10 keV synchrotron radiation.
Büermann L; Grosswendt B; Kramer HM; Selbach HJ; Gerlach M; Hoffmann M; Krumrey M
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5125-50. PubMed ID: 17019029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effective atomic numbers of some biomolecules calculated by two methods: a comparative study.
Manohara SR; Hanagodimath SM; Gerward L
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 19235382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
