124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22645385)
21. The characteristics of dental X-ray fluoroscopic equipment 'DreamRay 60F'.
Shin GS; Lee BR; Chang KH; Lee IJ; Lee W; Choi JH; Kim YH
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 20554581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical staff extremity dosimetry in CT fluoroscopy: an anthropomorphic hand voxel phantom study.
Figueira C; Becker F; Blunck C; DiMaria S; Baptista M; Esteves B; Paulo G; Santos J; Teles P; Vaz P
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(16):5433-48. PubMed ID: 23877320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose conversion coefficients based on the Chinese mathematical phantom and MCNP code for external photon irradiation.
Qiu R; Li J; Zhang Z; Liu L; Bi L; Ren L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 134(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 19376886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation dose and risk from fluoroscopically guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary procedures.
Stratakis J; Damilakis J; Hatzidakis A; Perisinakis K; Gourtsoyiannis N
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 16415136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selected organ dose conversion coefficients for external photons calculated using ICRP adult voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo code FLUKA.
Patni HK; Nadar MY; Akar DK; Bhati S; Sarkar PK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 21147784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of neutron fluence to organ dose conversion coefficients in the ORNL analytical adult phantom.
Miri Hakimabad H; Rafat Motavalli L; Karimi Shahri K
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 19225185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for deuterons, tritons and helions.
Copeland K; Friedberg W; Sato T; Niita K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Feb; 148(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 21474471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Collaert B; Theodorakou C; Rogers J; Walker A; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of effective dose during abdominal three-dimensional imaging for three flat-panel-detector angiography systems.
Suzuki S; Yamaguchi I; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Masumoto T; Ozaki Y
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Apr; 34(2):376-82. PubMed ID: 20495804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimation of absorbed organ doses and effective dose based on body mass index in digital radiography.
Kim H; Park M; Park S; Jeong H; Kim J; Kim Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22772453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of dose distributions around the pulsed-dose-rate Fletcher-Williamson and the low-dose-rate Fletcher-Suit-Delclos ovoids: a Monte Carlo study.
Price MJ; Gifford KA; Horton J; Lawyer A; Eifel P; Mourtada F
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4083-94. PubMed ID: 16885626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of protective patient equipment for CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Ott B; Stüssi A; Mini R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):213-21. PubMed ID: 20829205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of a web-based CT dose calculator: WAZA-ARI.
Ban N; Takahashi F; Sato K; Endo A; Ono K; Hasegawa T; Yoshitake T; Katsunuma Y; Kai M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21849327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A phantom for effective dose measurement: organ dose distribution assessment based on a numerical approach.
Furstoss C; Ménard S; Clairand I; Chau Q
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):180-4. PubMed ID: 17675663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance.
Fan J; Li J; Chen L; Stathakis S; Luo W; Du Plessis F; Xiong W; Yang J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2503-15. PubMed ID: 16675866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of specific absorbed fractions from internal photon sources in the ICRP Reference Male Phantom.
Ocampo JC; Puerta JA; Morales J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Nov; 157(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 23704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
