These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22645386)

  • 1. Doses and risks from uranium are not increased significantly by interactions with natural background photon radiation.
    Tanner RJ; Eakins JS; Jansen JT; Harrison JD
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):323-43. PubMed ID: 22645386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo analysis of possible cell dose enhancement effects by uranium microparticles in photon fields.
    Eakins JS; Jansen JT; Tanner RJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):177-80. PubMed ID: 21148167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interaction of natural background gamma radiation with depleted uranium micro-particles in the human body.
    Pattison JE
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):187-98. PubMed ID: 23295360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
    Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
    Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement of natural background gamma-radiation dose around uranium microparticles in the human body.
    Pattison JE; Hugtenburg RP; Green S
    J R Soc Interface; 2010 Apr; 7(45):603-11. PubMed ID: 19776147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons.
    Hadid L; Desbrée A; Schlattl H; Franck D; Blanchardon E; Zankl M
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3631-41. PubMed ID: 20526035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FASH and MASH: female and male adult human phantoms based on polygon mesh surfaces: II. Dosimetric calculations.
    Kramer R; Cassola VF; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW; Lima VJ; Brown KR
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):163-89. PubMed ID: 20009181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantitative comparison of the chemo- and radiotoxicity of uranium at different enrichment grades.
    Rump A; Eder S; Lamkowski A; Hermann C; Abend M; Port M
    Toxicol Lett; 2019 Oct; 313():159-168. PubMed ID: 31276769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of Capstone depleted uranium aerosol risk data to military combat risk management.
    Daxon EG; Parkhurst MA; Melanson MA; Roszell LE
    Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):380-92. PubMed ID: 19204493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiological risk assessment of Capstone depleted uranium aerosols.
    Hahn FF; Roszell LE; Daxon EG; Guilmette RA; Parkhurst MA
    Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 19204491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voxel modeling of rabbits for use in radiological dose rate calculations.
    Caffrey EA; Johansen MP; Higley KA
    J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():480-6. PubMed ID: 25971772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA strand breaks by direct energy deposition by Auger and photo-electrons ejected from DNA constituent atoms following K-shell photoabsorption.
    Watanabe R; Yokoya A; Fujii K; Saito K
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2004; 80(11-12):823-32. PubMed ID: 15764389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
    Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo investigation of the increased radiation deposition due to gold nanoparticles using kilovoltage and megavoltage photons in a 3D randomized cell model.
    Douglass M; Bezak E; Penfold S
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071710. PubMed ID: 23822414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations in energy spectra and water-to-material stopping-power ratios in three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated photon fields.
    Jang SY; Liu HH; Mohan R; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1388-97. PubMed ID: 17500470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capstone depleted uranium aerosol biokinetics, concentrations, and doses.
    Guilmette RA; Miller G; Parkhurst MA
    Health Phys; 2009 Mar; 96(3):328-42. PubMed ID: 19204489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo studies on photon interactions in radiobiological experiments.
    Shahmohammadi Beni M; Krstic D; Nikezic D; Yu KN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193575. PubMed ID: 29561871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Groundshine dose-rate conversion factors of soil contaminated to different depths.
    Yoo SJ; Lee JK; Kim EH; Jeong KH; Cho G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(3):407-29. PubMed ID: 23765073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beam energy considerations for gold nano-particle enhanced radiation treatment.
    Van den Heuvel F; Locquet JP; Nuyts S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4509-20. PubMed ID: 20668345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.