These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22645422)

  • 41. Examination of Prosody and Timbre Perception in Adults With Cochlear Implants Comparing Different Fine Structure Coding Strategies.
    Müller V; Klünter H; Fürstenberg D; Meister H; Walger M; Lang-Roth R
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 29536106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relationship between spectrotemporal modulation detection and music perception in normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Choi JE; Won JH; Kim CH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):800. PubMed ID: 29335454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Contribution of hearing aids to music perception by cochlear implant users.
    Peterson N; Bergeson TR
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S71-8. PubMed ID: 26561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.
    Nimmons GL; Kang RS; Drennan WR; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubenstien JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 18309572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).
    Zhu M; Chen B; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3562-5. PubMed ID: 22225012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.
    Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL423. PubMed ID: 30522318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality.
    Sucher CM; McDermott HJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():96-9. PubMed ID: 19230032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software.
    Smith L; Bartel L; Joglekar S; Chen J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e262-e267. PubMed ID: 28806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Timbre recognition in Danish children with hearing aids, cochlear implants or normal hearing.
    Kepp NE; Schiøth C; Percy-Smith L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 159():111186. PubMed ID: 35660937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rhythm processing in cochlear implant-mediated music perception.
    Jiam NT; Limb CJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2019 Oct; 1453(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 31168793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Jung KH; Won JH; Drennan WR; Jameyson E; Miyasaki G; Norton SJ; Rubinstein JT
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 22398954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Neurophysiological time course of timbre-induced music-like perception.
    Santoyo AE; Gonzales MG; Iqbal ZJ; Backer KC; Balasubramaniam R; Bortfeld H; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2023 Aug; 130(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 37377190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Knutson JF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20085197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Enhanced Pitch Discrimination for Cochlear Implant Users with a New Haptic Neuroprosthetic.
    Fletcher MD; Thini N; Perry SW
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10354. PubMed ID: 32587354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Music perception and training for pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Jiam NT; Limb C
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1193-1206. PubMed ID: 33090055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.