These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22646080)

  • 1. Understanding native Russian listeners' errors on an English word recognition test: model-based analysis of phoneme confusion.
    Shi LF; Morozova N
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):597-605. PubMed ID: 22646080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phoneme Error Pattern by Heritage Speakers of Spanish on an English Word Recognition Test.
    Shi LF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):352-365. PubMed ID: 28418329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic-Phonetic Versus Lexical Processing in Nonnative Listeners Differing in Their Dominant Language.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 25(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 27386797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by inexperienced Russian listeners.
    Gilichinskaya YD; Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):EL80-5. PubMed ID: 20707419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric function for NU-6 word recognition in noise: effects of first language and dominant language.
    Shi LF; Zaki NA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):236-45. PubMed ID: 24556968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects.
    Liu D; Shi LF
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 23800810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.
    Reinisch E; Weber A; Mitterer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22545600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese.
    Tajima K; Kato H; Rothwell A; Akahane-Yamada R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):397-413. PubMed ID: 18177169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of Phonemes: Differences between Phoneme Classes and the Effect of Class Size.
    Wagner A; Ernestus M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(1-2):106-27. PubMed ID: 18523368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurophysiological evidence of delayed segmentation in a foreign language.
    Snijders TM; Kooijman V; Cutler A; Hagoort P
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():106-13. PubMed ID: 17931604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts.
    Davidson L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 21090904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dialectal effects on a clinical Spanish word recognition test.
    Shi LF; Canizales LA
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 23064417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of native-language phonology in the auditory word identification and visual word recognition of Russian-English bilinguals.
    Shafiro V; Kharkhurin AV
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Mar; 38(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 18949561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners' recognition of English words in competing signals.
    Shi LF
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):260-70. PubMed ID: 19842801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.