90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2264664)
1. Aphakic visual fields by automated perimetry.
Miller BA; Gelber EC
Ann Ophthalmol; 1990 Nov; 22(11):419-22. PubMed ID: 2264664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Changes in the visual field caused by lens opacities].
Heider HW; Seez KJ; Schnaudigel OE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 198(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2023367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
Yellen M; Sherman J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of myopia on frequency-doubling perimetry.
Ito A; Kawabata H; Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 11274092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.
Flammer J; Drance SM; Augustiny L; Funkhouser A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Feb; 26(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 3972500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter.
Gardiner SK; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
Vision Res; 2004 Apr; 44(8):839-48. PubMed ID: 14967209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normal gray scale displays in the presence of arcuate scotomas in automated threshold perimetry.
Zalta AH
Ann Ophthalmol; 1990 Mar; 22(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 2331129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Roggen X; Herman K; Van Malderen L; Devos M; Spileers W
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients.
Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ
Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
