These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Debate over lead in air. Renner R Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1509-10. PubMed ID: 17396631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The lead debate goes on. Marcus SM Pediatrics; 1993 Jun; 91(6):1220-1. PubMed ID: 8502541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxicology. Overhaul of CDC panel revives lead safety debate. Ferber D Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5594):732. PubMed ID: 12399564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The lead debate continues. Environ Sci Technol; 1982 Apr; 16(4):208A-9A. PubMed ID: 22647003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The lead debate: a response. Environ Sci Technol; 1982 Apr; 16(4):208A. PubMed ID: 22647005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Animal models for human behavioral deficiencies during development. Elsner J Neurotoxicology; 1992; 13(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 1380686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The Danish debate on priority setting in medicine - characteristics and results]. Pornak S; Meyer T; Raspe H Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Oct; 73(10):680-7. PubMed ID: 21796589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Student perceptions of the use of debate as a teaching strategy in the allied health professions. Smith Randolph D J Allied Health; 2007; 36(1):e13-29. PubMed ID: 19759981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The internal suicide debate hypothesis: exploring the life versus death struggle. Harris KM; McLean JP; Sheffield J; Jobes D Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2010 Apr; 40(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 20465353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How dangerous are low (not moderate or high) doses of lead for children's intellectual development? Kaufman AS Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 May; 16(4):403-31. PubMed ID: 14590171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. To screen or not to screen: ongoing debate in the early detection of prostate cancer. Marroquin JM Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Feb; 15(1):97-8. PubMed ID: 21278045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of cancer biology, lead time bias, and length bias in the debate about cancer screening tests. Kay BR; Witte DL J Insur Med; 1991; 23(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 10147769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The American abortion debate: culture war or normal discourse? Dillon M Va Rev Sociol; 1995; 2():115-32. PubMed ID: 12320388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurobehavioral function in children with low blood lead concentrations. Min JY; Min KB; Cho SI; Kim R; Sakong J; Paek D Neurotoxicology; 2007 Mar; 28(2):421-5. PubMed ID: 16644013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Societal benefits of reducing lead exposure. Schwartz J Environ Res; 1994 Jul; 66(1):105-24. PubMed ID: 8013434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lead uptake, toxicity, and detoxification in plants. Pourrut B; Shahid M; Dumat C; Winterton P; Pinelli E Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 213():113-36. PubMed ID: 21541849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lead contamination in Uruguay: the "La Teja" neighborhood case. MaƱay N; Cousillas AZ; Alvarez C; Heller T Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008; 195():93-115. PubMed ID: 18418955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Position paper of the American Council on Science and Health: lead and human health. Juberg DR; Kleiman CF; Kwon SC Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Dec; 38(3):162-80. PubMed ID: 9469866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]