162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22647420)
1. Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.
Engelken F; Bremme R; Bick U; Hammann-Kloss S; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e844-8. PubMed ID: 22647420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities.
Ho WT; Lam PW
Clin Radiol; 2003 Feb; 58(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 12623042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology].
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7443-57. PubMed ID: 23093428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of breast density on computer aided detection.
Malich A; Fischer DR; Facius M; Petrovitch A; Boettcher J; Marx C; Hansch A; Kaiser WA
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Sep; 18(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 15827823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.
Wang X; Li L; Xu W; Liu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 22173323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
