These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22647520)

  • 1. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive assessment of aortic stenosis severity in the elderly.
    Gertz ZM; Raina A; O'Donnell W; McCauley BD; Shellenberger C; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Forfia PR; Herrmann HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jun; 5(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 22647520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach.
    Goland S; Trento A; Iida K; Czer LS; De Robertis M; Naqvi TZ; Tolstrup K; Akima T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Heart; 2007 Jul; 93(7):801-7. PubMed ID: 17488766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjusting parameters of aortic valve stenosis severity by body size.
    Minners J; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kaufmann BA; Bahlmann E; Gerdts E; Boman K; Chambers JB; Nienaber CA; Willenheimer R; Wachtell K; Holme I; Pedersen TR; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Heart; 2014 Jul; 100(13):1024-30. PubMed ID: 24780909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography.
    Clavel MA; Malouf J; Messika-Zeitoun D; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Enriquez-Sarano M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):248-257. PubMed ID: 25772832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.
    Yang CS; Marshall ES; Fanari Z; Kostal MJ; West JT; Kolm P; Weintraub WS; Doorey AJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(3):488-97. PubMed ID: 26033475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Berthelot-Richer M; Pibarot P; Capoulade R; Dumesnil JG; Dahou A; Thebault C; Le Ven F; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 27209111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states.
    Abbas AE; Pibarot P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):1002-1023. PubMed ID: 30790429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Woinke M; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Lachnitt A; Westermann Y; Geigenmueller A; Hermann KG; Butler C; Thiele H; Kivelitz DE
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):360-8. PubMed ID: 19412115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Blot-Souletie N; Hébrard A; Acar P; Carrié D; Puel J
    Echocardiography; 2007 Nov; 24(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18001360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation.
    Gaspar T; Adawi S; Sachner R; Asmer I; Ganaeem M; Rubinshtein R; Shiran A
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jul; 25(7):749-57. PubMed ID: 22613774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamic progression of valvular aortic stenosis over time: comparison between aortic valve resistance and valve area.
    Faggiano P; Gualeni A; Antonini-Canterin F; Rusconi C; Nicolosi G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 29(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 10546122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination.
    Anger T; Bauer V; Plachtzik C; Geisler T; Gawaz MP; Oberhoff M; Höher M
    J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 24060524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catheterization-Doppler discrepancies in nonsimultaneous evaluations of aortic stenosis.
    Aghassi P; Aurigemma GP; Folland ED; Tighe DA
    Echocardiography; 2005 May; 22(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 15901286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation.
    Ho PP; Pauls GL; Lamberton DF; Portnoff JS; Pai RG; Shah PM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 8087265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important?
    Michelena HI; Margaryan E; Miller FA; Eleid M; Maalouf J; Suri R; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pellikka PA; Enriquez-Sarano M
    Heart; 2013 Jul; 99(13):921-31. PubMed ID: 23349350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF.
    Clavel MA; Ennezat PV; Maréchaux S; Dumesnil JG; Capoulade R; Hachicha Z; Mathieu P; Bellouin A; Bergeron S; Meimoun P; Arsenault M; Le Tourneau T; Pasquet A; Couture C; Pibarot P
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 23489531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of new and old Doppler echocardiographic indexes of the severity of aortic stenosis in patients with a low cardiac output.
    Antonini-Canterin F; Huang G; Cervesato E; Faggiano P; Pavan D; Piazza R; Burelli C; Cassin M; Macor F; Zardo F; Nicolosi GL
    Ital Heart J; 2002 Apr; 3(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 12025374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.