143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22647925)
1. Conventional versus 3-dimensional miniplate in management of mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
Singh V; Puri P; Arya S; Malik S; Bhagol A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):450-5. PubMed ID: 22647925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
Singh V; Kumar I; Bhagol A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.
Vineeth K; Lalitha RM; Prasad K; Ranganath K; Shwetha V; Singh J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 22809633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a single noncompression miniplate versus 2 noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Danda AK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1565-7. PubMed ID: 20430504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
Sehgal S; Ramanujam L; Prasad K; Krishnappa R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
Gupta A; Singh V; Mohammad S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of straight and curved 3-dimensional titanium miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
Zix J; Lieger O; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1758-63. PubMed ID: 17719394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures.
Jain MK; Manjunath KS; Bhagwan BK; Shah DK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1568-72. PubMed ID: 20417012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
Chritah A; Lazow SK; Berger JR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1737-41. PubMed ID: 16297694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of rectangular grid miniplates for fracture fixation at the mandibular angle.
Hochuli-Vieira E; Ha TK; Pereira-Filho VA; Landes CA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1436-41. PubMed ID: 21216065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.
Kumar I; Singh V; Singh A; Arora V; Bajaj A
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 23184064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The three-dimensional titanium miniplate rigid fixation in the treatment of fracture of maxilla].
Lai G
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Jul; 11(4):196-8. PubMed ID: 9867976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small and large titanium plates are equally effective for treating mandible fractures.
Bouloux GF; Chen S; Threadgill JM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 22698293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superior border plating technique in the management of isolated mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients.
Barry CP; Kearns GJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1544-9. PubMed ID: 17656281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-14. PubMed ID: 20655176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study.
Siddiqui A; Markose G; Moos KF; McMahon J; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 45(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 17110006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [AO and miniplate osteosynthesis of the mandible in an 8-year comparison].
Niederhagen B; Anke S; Hültenschmidt D; Appel T
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():58-60. PubMed ID: 8755400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between three-dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical study.
Al-Moraissi EA; Mounair RM; El-Sharkawy TM; El-Ghareeb TI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 25457871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A clinical investigation on miniplate fixation as tension band for mandibular angle fracture].
Zhang Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Sep; 35(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 11780238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
