These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study. Noguera J; Tejada S; Tortajada C; Sánchez A; Muñoz J Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4284-90. PubMed ID: 23812286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Bucher P; Ostermann S; Pugin F; Morel P Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2308-15. PubMed ID: 21301884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study. Bulian DR; Trump L; Knuth J; Siegel R; Sauerwald A; Ströhlein MA; Heiss MM Surg Endosc; 2013 Feb; 27(2):580-6. PubMed ID: 22926893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Peng C; Ling Y; Ma C; Ma X; Fan W; Niu W; Niu J Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Oct; 26(5):347-353. PubMed ID: 27557339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Bulian DR; Knuth J; Cerasani N; Sauerwald A; Lefering R; Heiss MM Ann Surg; 2015 Mar; 261(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 24108196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of short-term outcomes between transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Santos BF; Teitelbaum EN; Arafat FO; Milad MP; Soper NJ; Hungness ES Surg Endosc; 2012 Nov; 26(11):3058-66. PubMed ID: 22549379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experience with a multifunctional, flexible surgery system for endolumenal, single-port, and NOTES procedures. Horgan S; Thompson K; Talamini M; Ferreres A; Jacobsen G; Spaun G; Cullen J; Swanstrom L Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):586-92. PubMed ID: 20734085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal-hybrid vs. single-port-access vs. 'conventional' laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Kilian M; Raue W; Menenakos C; Wassersleben B; Hartmann J Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2011 Jun; 396(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 21384187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. van den Boezem PB; Velthuis S; Lourens HJ; Cuesta MA; Sietses C World J Surg; 2014 Jan; 38(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 24081531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a retrospective case-control study]. Hensel M; Schernikau U; Schmidt A; Arlt G Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Feb; 137(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 20446249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Zornig C; Mofid H; Emmermann A; Alm M; von Waldenfels HA; Felixmüller C Surg Endosc; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1427-9. PubMed ID: 18398645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comment on "prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)" (doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2359-4). Carlson MA Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3929-30. PubMed ID: 23636520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Broad clinical utilization of NOTES: is it safe? Horgan S; Meireles OR; Jacobsen GR; Sandler BJ; Ferreres A; Ramamoorthy S; Savides T; Katagiri T; Dotai T; Sedrak M; Majid SF; Nijhawan S; Talamini MA Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1872-80. PubMed ID: 23479251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a series of 102 patients. Wood SG; Panait L; Duffy AJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE Ann Surg; 2014 Apr; 259(4):744-9. PubMed ID: 23598384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy). Sohn BS; Kim SR; Park IY; Kim EJ J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Apr; 20(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 20374013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2958-8: Re: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250) : do we know the correct sample size? Noguera J Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3931. PubMed ID: 23636524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery of radical sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. Fu T; Liu Y; Li K Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():90-91. PubMed ID: 31500793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]