179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22648605)
1. Capture of the gaze does not capture the mind.
Lange EB; Starzynski C; Engbert R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1168-82. PubMed ID: 22648605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-domain interference costs during concurrent verbal and spatial serial memory tasks are asymmetric.
Morey CC; Mall JT
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1777-97. PubMed ID: 22512308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture.
Wong JH; Peterson MS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiating between verbal and spatial encoding using eye-movement recordings.
Lange EB; Engbert R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1840-57. PubMed ID: 23472620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?
Oberauer K; Bialkova S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory.
Bao M; Li ZH; Zhang DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 17723072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
Farrand P; Jones D
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting.
Watson DG; Maylor EA; Bruce LA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1389-99. PubMed ID: 18085951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?
Portrat S; Barrouillet P; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1561-4. PubMed ID: 18980415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
Moore KS; Weissman DH
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use.
Droll JA; Hayhoe MM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1352-65. PubMed ID: 18085948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When do spatial and visual working memory interact?
Wood JN
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):420-39. PubMed ID: 21264717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved top-down control reduces oculomotor capture: the case of action video game players.
Chisholm JD; Kingstone A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 22160821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display.
Loschky LC; McConkie GW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Jun; 8(2):99-117. PubMed ID: 12075694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
Burnham BR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the spatial interaction of visual working memory and attention: evidence for a global effect from memory-guided saccades.
Herwig A; Beisert M; Schneider WX
J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):8. PubMed ID: 20616119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
