146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22648674)
1. Chapter 6: assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews.
Hartmann KE; Matchar DB; Chang S
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S39-46. PubMed ID: 22648674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks.
Samson D; Schoelles KM
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-9. PubMed ID: 22648670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews.
Matchar DB
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-10. PubMed ID: 22648669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.
Relevo R
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 22648672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.
Tatsioni A; Zarin DA; Aronson N; Samson DJ; Flamm CR; Schmid C; Lau J
Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. PubMed ID: 15968029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chapter 5: assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.
Santaguida PL; Riley CM; Matchar DB
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-8. PubMed ID: 22648673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chapter 7: grading a body of evidence on diagnostic tests.
Singh S; Chang SM; Matchar DB; Bass EB
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47-55. PubMed ID: 22648675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chapter 12: systematic review of prognostic tests.
Rector TS; Taylor BC; Wilt TJ
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S94-101. PubMed ID: 22648680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chapter 3: choosing the important outcomes for a systematic review of a medical test.
Segal JB
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S20-7. PubMed ID: 22648671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chapter 10: deciding whether to complement a systematic review of medical tests with decision modeling.
Trikalinos TA; Kulasingam S; Lawrence WF
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S76-82. PubMed ID: 22648678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chapter 9: options for summarizing medical test performance in the absence of a "gold standard".
Trikalinos TA; Balion CM
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S67-75. PubMed ID: 22648677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chapter 8: meta-analysis of test performance when there is a "gold standard".
Trikalinos TA; Balion CM; Coleman CI; Griffith L; Santaguida PL; Vandermeer B; Fu R
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S56-66. PubMed ID: 22648676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Chapter 11: challenges in and principles for conducting systematic reviews of genetic tests used as predictive indicators.
Jonas DE; Wilt TJ; Taylor BC; Wilkins TM; Matchar DB
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S83-93. PubMed ID: 22648679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making.
Burford B; Lewin S; Welch V; Rehfuess E; Waters E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1251-61. PubMed ID: 23953081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
