These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22649307)

  • 21. Neural networks predict response biases of female túngara frogs.
    Phelps SM; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 265(1393):279-85. PubMed ID: 9523430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Receiver psychology and the design of animal signals.
    Guilford T; Dawkins MS
    Trends Neurosci; 1993 Nov; 16(11):430-6. PubMed ID: 7507611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phylogenetic distribution of a male pheromone that may exploit a nonsexual preference in lampreys.
    Buchinger TJ; Bussy U; Li K; Wang H; Huertas M; Baker CF; Jia L; Hayes MC; Li W; Johnson NS
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Dec; 30(12):2244-2254. PubMed ID: 29030885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evolutionary causes and consequences of sequential polyandry in anuran amphibians.
    Byrne PG; Roberts JD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Feb; 87(1):209-28. PubMed ID: 21740503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of chemical communication in mate choice.
    Johansson BG; Jones TM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):265-89. PubMed ID: 17437561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of familiarity in signaller-receiver interactions.
    Ma WJ; Higham JP
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Dec; 15(149):20180568. PubMed ID: 30958228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern tüngara frogs.
    Pröhl H; Koshy RA; Mueller U; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1669-79. PubMed ID: 17017067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Behavioural divergence, interfertility and speciation: a review.
    Pillay N; Rymer TL
    Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):223-35. PubMed ID: 22982487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural activity patterns in response to interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating calls in the túngara frog.
    Chakraborty M; Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12898. PubMed ID: 20877560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Arginine vasotocin affects vocal behavior but not selective responses to conspecific calls in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Goutte S; Ryan MJ
    Horm Behav; 2021 Feb; 128():104891. PubMed ID: 33197465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling Sexual Selection in Túngara Frog and Rationality of Mate Choice.
    Vargas Bernal E; Sanabria Malagon C
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 79(12):2847-2864. PubMed ID: 28983864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parasite defensive limb movements enhance acoustic signal attraction in male little torrent frogs.
    Zhao L; Wang J; Zhang H; Wang T; Yang Y; Tang Y; Halfwerk W; Cui J
    Elife; 2022 May; 11():. PubMed ID: 35522043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes.
    Broder ED; Elias DO; Rodríguez RL; Rosenthal GG; Seymoure BM; Tinghitella RM
    Biol Lett; 2021 Feb; 17(2):20200733. PubMed ID: 33529546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multimodal stimuli regulate reproductive behavior and physiology in male túngara frogs.
    Still MB; Lea AM; Hofmann HA; Ryan MJ
    Horm Behav; 2019 Sep; 115():104546. PubMed ID: 31233717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recognition of spectral patterns in the green treefrog: neurobiology and evolution.
    Gerhardt HC
    Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 3525220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The evolution of individual variation in communication strategies.
    Botero CA; Pen I; Komdeur J; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3123-33. PubMed ID: 20561050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
    Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Weak warning signals can persist in the absence of gene flow.
    Lawrence JP; Rojas B; Fouquet A; Mappes J; Blanchette A; Saporito RA; Bosque RJ; Courtois EA; Noonan BP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Sep; 116(38):19037-19045. PubMed ID: 31481623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolutionary and natural history of the turtle frog, Myobatrachus gouldii, a bizarre myobatrachid frog in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot.
    Vertucci S; Pepper M; Edwards DL; Roberts JD; Mitchell N; Keogh JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173348. PubMed ID: 28296914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.