These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22649504)

  • 1. The general age of leadership: older-looking presidential candidates win elections during war.
    Spisak BR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36945. PubMed ID: 22649504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voting for a Male Warrior or Female Peacekeeper? Testing the Evolutionary Contingency Hypothesis in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.
    Grabo A; van Vugt M
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918773267. PubMed ID: 29911423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testosterone fluctuations in response to a democratic election predict partisan attitudes toward the elected leader.
    Prasad S; Knight EL; Sarkar A; Welker KM; Lassetter B; Mehta PH
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2021 Nov; 133():105396. PubMed ID: 34508970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating group norms through election results.
    Syfers L; Gaffney AM; Rast DE; Estrada DA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2022 Jan; 61(1):300-321. PubMed ID: 34258766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
    Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Warriors and peacekeepers: testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces.
    Spisak BR; Dekker PH; Krüger M; van Vugt M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30399. PubMed ID: 22276190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Height, societal threat, and the victory margin in presidential elections (1824-1992).
    McCann SJ
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):741-2. PubMed ID: 11508013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No guts, no glory? How risk-taking shapes dominance, prestige, and leadership endorsement.
    van Kleef GA; Heerdink MW; Cheshin A; Stamkou E; Wanders F; Koning LF; Fang X; Georgeac OAM
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Nov; 106(11):1673-1694. PubMed ID: 33507768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts.
    Re DE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 23372088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do heads of government age more quickly? Observational study comparing mortality between elected leaders and runners-up in national elections of 17 countries.
    Olenski AR; Abola MV; Jena AB
    BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6424. PubMed ID: 26666894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When do people prefer dominant over prestigious political leaders?
    Jiménez ÁV; Flitton A; Mesoudi A
    Evol Hum Sci; 2021; 3():e16. PubMed ID: 37588522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postmaterialism and referenda voting to legalize marijuana.
    Frendreis J; Tatalovich R
    Int J Drug Policy; 2020 Jan; 75():102595. PubMed ID: 31739149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context-specific effects of facial dominance and trustworthiness on hypothetical leadership decisions.
    Ferguson HS; Owen A; Hahn AC; Torrance J; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0214261. PubMed ID: 31356614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Perils of Leading a Democracy.
    Rathee S; Mishra H; Mishra A
    Int J Aging Hum Dev; 2021 Jun; 92(4):472-491. PubMed ID: 32233645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The power shield: Powerful roles eliminate gender disparities in political elections.
    Pike BE; Galinsky AD
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Feb; 106(2):268-280. PubMed ID: 32297766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.