These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22650085)

  • 21. Using CBCT in the general practice.
    Farman AG; Feuerstein P; Levato CM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Mar; 32(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 21473296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CBCT technology for diagnosis and treatment planning: what general practitioners should consider.
    Jansen CE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):749-53; quiz 754, 756. PubMed ID: 25454528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
    Ganz SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-aided orthognathic surgery.
    Gelesko S; Markiewicz MR; Weimer K; Bell RB
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2012 Mar; 20(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 22365433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Media scare versus diagnostic awareness.
    Ganz SD
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 21448018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation.
    Scarfe WC; Li Z; Aboelmaaty W; Scott SA; Farman AG
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():46-60. PubMed ID: 22376097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefits of Sirona's ORTHOPHOS XG 3D system extend far beyond implantology.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):784. PubMed ID: 25742682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics.
    Nervina JM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():95-102. PubMed ID: 22376101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital radiography: analyzing the benefits.
    Jablow M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Feb; 33(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 22545432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generating an Ideal Virtual Setup with Three-Dimensional Crowns and Roots.
    Lee RJ; Pham J; Weissheimer A; Tong H
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 Nov; 49(11):696-700. PubMed ID: 26684842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A single appointment protocol to create a partially edentulous CAD/CAM guided surgical template: a clinical report.
    Marchack CB; Charles A; Pettersson A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):346-9. PubMed ID: 22133389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital dentistry: a new era of patient care.
    Culp L
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013; 34(10):782-3. PubMed ID: 24571507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities.
    White SC; Pharoah MJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):689-705, v. PubMed ID: 18805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of 3-dimensional imaging in dentoalveolar surgery.
    Orentlicher G; Abboud M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):78-80, 82, 85-6. PubMed ID: 21755898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
    Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A quantum leap in dental technology.
    Pugliese R
    Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2007; 74(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 17427583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of cephalometric landmarks with 3-dimensional volumetric computer modeling to position an auricular implant surgical template: a clinical report.
    Kolodney H; Swedenburg G; Taylor SS; Carron JD; Schlakman BN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 22024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.