These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22650094)

  • 1. Nanomicrohybrid composites make posterior placement easier.
    Vargas M
    Dent Today; 2012 May; 31(5):128, 130-1. PubMed ID: 22650094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technique tips--the modified super-closed sandwich technique.
    Smithson J
    Dent Update; 2013 Mar; 40(2):155-6. PubMed ID: 23600042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Feilzer AJ; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 21397316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "The simplified concept": predictable posterior composites.
    Smithson J
    Dent Today; 2012 Jan; 31(1):136-8, 140. PubMed ID: 22360120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oral diagnosis and treatment planning: part 8. Reviews and maintenance of restorations.
    Smales R; Yip K
    Br Dent J; 2012 Oct; 213(8):387-94. PubMed ID: 23099691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recreating Mother Nature with direct resin restorations.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):82, 84. PubMed ID: 19408587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite.
    de Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Medeiros e Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    J Dent; 2011 Jan; 39(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20888884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Smart" Class V Preparation Design for Direct Composites.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2015 Feb; 34(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 26349261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of nanofill and nanohybrid composite in Class I restorations: a 12-month randomized trial.
    Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e255-62. PubMed ID: 22782061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
    Magne P
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of composites filled with nanoparticles in permanent molars: Six-month results.
    Andrade AK; Duarte RM; Silva FD; Batista AU; Lima KC; Pontual ML; Montes MA
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(5):e190-5. PubMed ID: 20829151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical wear rate of direct and indirect posterior composite resin restorations.
    Cetin AR; Unlu N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Jun; 32(3):e87-94. PubMed ID: 22408783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification and management of dental caries. New concepts.
    Sathyanarayanan R; Carounnanidy U
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12420564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.