136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22650990)
1. The relationship between vertical stimulation and horizontal attentional asymmetries.
Nicholls ME; Thomas NA; Loetscher T; Wignall S; Yates MJ; Forte JD; Spence CJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2384-96. PubMed ID: 22650990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
Szelest I; Elias LJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
Thomas NA; Elias LJ
Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free viewing perceptual asymmetry for distance judgments: objects in right hemispace are closer than they appear.
Brian Krupp D; Robinson BM; Elias LJ
Int J Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 120(8):580-2. PubMed ID: 20615063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Smith A; Bradshaw JL
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 15062866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
Orr CA; Nicholls ME
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of body and environment-centred coordinates on free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
Nicholls ME; Smith A; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
Cortex; 2006 Apr; 42(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 16771039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information.
Mohr C; Leonards U
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16945395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?
Nicholls ME; Roberts GR
Cortex; 2002 Apr; 38(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 12056684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
Tomer R
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
