These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22651116)

  • 21. Adaptive dose insertion in early phase clinical trials.
    Hu B; Bekele BN; Ji Y
    Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 20819841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
    Gönen M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.
    Colin P; Micallef S; Delattre M; Mancini P; Parent E
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2999-3016. PubMed ID: 26059319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
    Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identifying a maximum tolerated contour in two-dimensional dose finding.
    Wages NA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):242-253. PubMed ID: 26910586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An adaptive dose-finding approach for correlated bivariate binary and continuous outcomes in phase I oncology trials.
    Hirakawa A
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(6):516-32. PubMed ID: 22108785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Jiang H; Liu Y; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 17681867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.
    Ji Y; Li Y; Nebiyou Bekele B
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 17715248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.
    Braun TM; Thall PF; Nguyen H; de Lima M
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 17456511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.
    Xie F; Ji Y; Tremmel L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 22426247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toxicity-evaluation designs for phase I/II cancer immunotherapy trials.
    Messer K; Natarajan L; Ball ED; Lane TA
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):712-20. PubMed ID: 20213706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.
    Huang X; Biswas S; Oki Y; Issa JP; Berry DA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 17688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discrete event simulation applied to pediatric phase I oncology designs.
    Barrett J; Skolnik J; Jayaraman B; Patel D; Adamson P
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Dec; 84(6):729-33. PubMed ID: 18923388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sequential designs for logistic phase I clinical trials.
    Liu G; Rosenberger WF; Haines LM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):605-21. PubMed ID: 17037261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adaptive Bayesian design for phase I dose-finding trials using a joint model of response and toxicity.
    Wang M; Day R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 20077253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dose-finding approach for dose escalation with overdose control considering incomplete observations.
    Mauguen A; Le Deley MC; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1584-94. PubMed ID: 21351289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An approach to meta-analysis of dose-finding studies.
    Zohar S; Katsahian S; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2109-16. PubMed ID: 21344473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Toxicity equivalence range design (TEQR): a practical Phase I design.
    Blanchard MS; Longmate JA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 20923709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity of dose-finding studies to observation errors.
    Zohar S; O'Quigley J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Nov; 30(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 19580886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.