411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22651804)
1. Efficiency of genomic selection using Bayesian multi-marker models for traits selected to reflect a wide range of heritabilities and frequencies of detected quantitative traits loci in mice.
Kapell DN; Sorensen D; Su G; Janss LL; Ashworth CJ; Roehe R
BMC Genet; 2012 May; 13():42. PubMed ID: 22651804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.
Richter J; Hidalgo J; Bussiman F; Breen V; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38576313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel analytical method, Birth Date Selection Mapping, detects response of the Angus (Bos taurus) genome to selection on complex traits.
Decker JE; Vasco DA; McKay SD; McClure MC; Rolf MM; Kim J; Northcutt SL; Bauck S; Woodward BW; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
BMC Genomics; 2012 Nov; 13():606. PubMed ID: 23140540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic architecture and genomic selection of female reproduction traits in rainbow trout.
D'Ambrosio J; Morvezen R; Brard-Fudulea S; Bestin A; Acin Perez A; Guéméné D; Poncet C; Haffray P; Dupont-Nivet M; Phocas F
BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):558. PubMed ID: 32795250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18076473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic selection models substantially improve the accuracy of genetic merit predictions for fillet yield and body weight in rainbow trout using a multi-trait model and multi-generation progeny testing.
Garcia A; Tsuruta S; Gao G; Palti Y; Lourenco D; Leeds T
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Feb; 55(1):11. PubMed ID: 36759760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multi-trait Bayesian method for mapping QTL and genomic prediction.
Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):10. PubMed ID: 29571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inferring genetic architecture of complex traits using Bayesian integrative analysis of genome and transcriptome data.
Ehsani A; Sørensen P; Pomp D; Allan M; Janss L
BMC Genomics; 2012 Sep; 13():456. PubMed ID: 22950759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels.
Habier D; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
Genetics; 2009 May; 182(1):343-53. PubMed ID: 19299339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Theoretical efficiency of multiple-trait quantitative trait loci-assisted selection.
Togashi K; Lin CY
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Feb; 127(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 20074187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
