477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22652111)
1. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy consistently results in high quality dosimetry.
White EC; Kamrava MR; Demarco J; Park SJ; Wang PC; Kayode O; Steinberg ML; Demanes DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 22652111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric evaluation of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost treatments for localized prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Agoston P; Lövey J; Somogyi A; Fodor J; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Jul; 186(7):388-95. PubMed ID: 20582396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel urethral sparing technique for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Kunogi H; Cunha JAM; Chang AJ; Gadzinski AJ; Shinohara K; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 28869143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dosimetric evaluation of interstitial high-dose-rate implants for localised prostate cancer].
Fröhlich G; Agoston P; Lövey J; Somogyi A; Fodor J; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2007; 51(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17417673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraoperative ultrasound-based planning can effectively replace postoperative CT-based planning for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Batchelar DL; Chung HT; Loblaw A; Law N; Cisecki T; Morton GC
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 27180126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric considerations to determine the optimal technique for localized prostate cancer among external photon, proton, or carbon-ion therapy and high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Georg D; Hopfgartner J; Gòra J; Kuess P; Kragl G; Berger D; Hegazy N; Goldner G; Georg P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):715-22. PubMed ID: 24521685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison between treatment plans of patients treated with low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate interstitial prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Initial findings of a randomized clinical trial.
Major T; Polgár C; Jorgo K; Stelczer G; Ágoston P
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28325472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a dosimetric comparison of hemigland vs. conventional whole-gland treatment.
Kamrava M; Chung MP; Kayode O; Wang J; Marks L; Kupelian P; Steinberg M; Park SJ; Demanes DJ
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 23406987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A stochastic frontier analysis for enhanced treatment quality of high-dose-rate brachytherapy plans.
Edimo P; Kroshko A; Beaulieu L; Archambault L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065012. PubMed ID: 30731437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential role of various dosimetric quality indicators in prostate brachytherapy.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jun; 44(3):717-24. PubMed ID: 10348304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of HDR interstitial breast implants planned by conventional and optimized CT-based dosimetry systems with respect to dose homogeneity and conformality.
Major T; Fodor J; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Agoston P; Polgár C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15702297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
