These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22653067)

  • 1. Does the new standard for eugenol designed to protect against contact sensitization protect those sensitized from elicitation of the reaction?
    Svedman C; Engfeldt M; Api AM; Politano VT; Belsito DV; Gruvberger B; Bruze M
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 22653067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot study aimed at finding a suitable eugenol concentration for a leave-on product for use in a repeated open application test.
    Svedman C; Engfeldt M; Api AM; Politano VT; Belsito DV; Isaksson M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):137-9. PubMed ID: 22320668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals.
    Andersen KE; Johansen JD; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; Rastogi S; White I; Menné T
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2001 Feb; 170(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11162781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allergic reactivity for different dilutions of eugenol in repeated open application test and patch testing.
    Ofenloch RF; Andersen KE; Foti C; Giménez-Arnau AM; Mowitz M; Salvador JFS; Svedman C; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Aug; 89(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 37218587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
    Fischer LA; Menné T; Avnstorp C; Kasting GB; Johansen JD
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 19486000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients.
    Schnuch A; Kelterer D; Bauer A; Schuster Ch; Aberer W; Mahler V; Katzer K; Rakoski J; Jappe U; Krautheim A; Bircher A; Koch P; Worm M; Löffler H; Hillen U; Frosch PJ; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 15859992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
    Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase.
    Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced content of chloroatranol and atranol in oak moss absolute significantly reduces the elicitation potential of this fragrance material.
    Andersen F; Andersen KH; Bernois A; Brault C; Bruze M; Eudes H; Gadras C; Signoret AC; Mose KF; Müller BP; Toulemonde B; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Feb; 72(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 25395354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Air-oxidized linalool elicits eczema in allergic patients - a repeated open application test study.
    Andersch Björkman Y; Hagvall L; Siwmark C; Niklasson B; Karlberg AT; Bråred Christensson J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 24588367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
    Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde- known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen.
    Johansen JD; Frosch PJ; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Pirker C; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jun; 48(6):310-6. PubMed ID: 14531869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship-A repeated open application test (ROAT) study.
    Bennike NH; Palangi L; Christensson JB; Nilsson U; Zachariae C; Johansen JD; Hagvall L
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Apr; 80(4):208-216. PubMed ID: 30378136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005.
    White JM; White IR; Glendinning A; Fleming J; Jefferies D; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Buckley DA
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 157(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 17573874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
    Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Ofenloch R; Elsner P; Goncalo M; Isaksson M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar ML; Svensson Å; Diepgen T
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 182(4):955-964. PubMed ID: 31206595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens.
    Bonefeld CM; Nielsen MM; Rubin IM; Vennegaard MT; Dabelsteen S; Gimenéz-Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Geisler C; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):336-42. PubMed ID: 21767274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative risk assessment of contact sensitization: clinical data to assess utility of the model.
    Marie Api A; Belsito D; Bickers D; Bruze M; Calow P; Greim H; Hanifin JM; McNamee PM; Rogers AE; Saurat JH; Sipes IG; Tagami H
    Dermatitis; 2010; 21(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 20646672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
    Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 159(5):1138-43. PubMed ID: 18795931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde sensitive-patients.
    Schnuch A; Uter W; Dickel H; Szliska C; Schliemann S; Eben R; Ruëff F; Gimenez-Arnau A; Löffler H; Aberer W; Frambach Y; Worm M; Niebuhr M; Hillen U; Martin V; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Mahler V
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Sep; 61(3):152-62. PubMed ID: 19780773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.