These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22653078)
1. Insightful practice: a reliable measure for medical revalidation. Murphy DJ; Guthrie B; Sullivan FM; Mercer SW; Russell A; Bruce DA BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 22653078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insightful Practice: a robust measure of medical students' professional response to feedback on their performance. Murphy D; Aitchison P; Hernandez Santiago V; Davey P; Mires G; Nathwani D BMC Med Educ; 2015 Aug; 15():125. PubMed ID: 26232114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice. Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers. Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? Coomber J; Charlton R; Thistlethwaite JE; England L BMC Fam Pract; 2012 Dec; 13():123. PubMed ID: 23253694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation. Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs. Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GPAQ-R: development and psychometric properties of a version of the general practice assessment questionnaire for use for revalidation by general practitioners in the UK. Roland M; Roberts M; Rhenius V; Campbell J BMC Fam Pract; 2013 Oct; 14():160. PubMed ID: 24138508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient feedback in revalidation: an exploratory study using the consultation satisfaction questionnaire. Baker R; Smith A; Tarrant C; McKinley RK; Taub N Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Oct; 61(591):e638-44. PubMed ID: 22152843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland. Wakeling J; Cameron N Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability and validity of a matrix to assess the completed reflective personal development plans of general practitioners. Roberts C; Cromarty I; Crossley J; Jolly B Med Educ; 2006 Apr; 40(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 16573673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal. Curnock E; Bowie P; Pope L; McKay J BMC Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22443714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice. Dale J; Potter R; Owen K; Leach J BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():84. PubMed ID: 27439982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: a cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire. Middlemass J; Siriwardena AN Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 37(9):778-85. PubMed ID: 12950940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Knowledge, attitudes and skills of dementia care in general practice: a cross-sectional study in primary health settings in Beijing, China. Wang M; Xu X; Huang Y; Shao S; Chen X; Li J; Du J BMC Fam Pract; 2020 May; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 32416731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Ram P; Grol R; Rethans JJ; Schouten B; van der Vleuten C; Kester A Med Educ; 1999 Jun; 33(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 10354322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers. Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-licensing of general practitioners using the current UK revalidation proposals: a cross sectional study. Charlton R; Coomber J; Thistlethwaite JE Postgrad Med J; 2011 Dec; 87(1034):807-13. PubMed ID: 22021445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results. Campbell JL; Roberts M; Wright C; Hill J; Greco M; Taylor M; Richards S BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6212. PubMed ID: 22034193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]