214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22653190)
1. How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers?
Sutter R; Dietrich TJ; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CW
Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):514-21. PubMed ID: 22653190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
Sutter R; Dietrich TJ; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CW
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 22403167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond the alpha angle: Alternative measurements for quantifying cam-type deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.
Ehrmann C; Rosskopf AB; Pfirrmann CW; Sutter R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1024-31. PubMed ID: 25639986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pincer-type MRI morphology seen in over a third of asymptomatic healthy volunteers without femoroacetabular impingement.
Bensler S; Dietrich TJ; Zubler V; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1296-1303. PubMed ID: 30318790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: global assessment of the femoral head-neck junction on a single reformatted MR image.
Magerkurth O; Jacobson JA; Jax F; Morag Y; Fessell D; Lee SJ; Bedi A; Sekiya JK
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):822-30. PubMed ID: 23657889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated?
Nouh MR; Schweitzer ME; Rybak L; Cohen J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1260-2. PubMed ID: 18430841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients.
Pfirrmann CW; Mengiardi B; Dora C; Kalberer F; Zanetti M; Hodler J
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):778-85. PubMed ID: 16857978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The epiphyseal torsion angle in MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic utility in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
Schaeffeler C; Eiber M; Holzapfel K; Gollwitzer H; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):W237-43. PubMed ID: 22358020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers.
Hack K; Di Primio G; Rakhra K; Beaulé PE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Oct; 92(14):2436-44. PubMed ID: 20962194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Femoral Antetorsion With MRI: Comparison of Oblique Measurements to Standard Transverse Measurements.
Sutter R; Dietrich TJ; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):130-5. PubMed ID: 26102391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement.
Pfirrmann CW; Duc SR; Zanetti M; Dora C; Hodler J
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 18682585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can We Discriminate Symptomatic Hip Patients From Asymptomatic Volunteers Based on Anatomic Predictors? A 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Study on Cam, Pincer, and Spinopelvic Parameters.
Mascarenhas VV; Rego P; Dantas P; Caetano AP; Jans L; Sutter R; Marques RM; Ayeni OR; Consciência JG
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Nov; 46(13):3097-3110. PubMed ID: 30379583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): preliminary results on comparison of standard diagnostic vs delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC).
Bittersohl B; Steppacher S; Haamberg T; Kim YJ; Werlen S; Beck M; Siebenrock KA; Mamisch TC
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2009 Oct; 17(10):1297-306. PubMed ID: 19446663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography.
Schmid MR; Nötzli HP; Zanetti M; Wyss TF; Hodler J
Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 12563129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasonography: value of anterior femoral distance measurements.
Hsu YC; Wu YC; Wang HH; Lee MS; Huang GS
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E158-E165. PubMed ID: 23238801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. T2* mapping of acetabular and femoral hip joint cartilage at 3 T: a prospective controlled study.
Bittersohl B; Miese FR; Hosalkar HS; Mamisch TC; Antoch G; Krauspe R; Zilkens C
Invest Radiol; 2012 Jul; 47(7):392-7. PubMed ID: 22627944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of increased alpha angles as a measure of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in youth ice hockey players.
Philippon MJ; Ho CP; Briggs KK; Stull J; LaPrade RF
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jun; 41(6):1357-62. PubMed ID: 23562808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer?
Lohan DG; Seeger LL; Motamedi K; Hame S; Sayre J
Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(9):855-62. PubMed ID: 19565238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoroacetabular impingement.
Kassarjian A; Brisson M; Palmer WE
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jul; 63(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17485190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.
Kassarjian A; Yoon LS; Belzile E; Connolly SA; Millis MB; Palmer WE
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):588-92. PubMed ID: 15972331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
