These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22653939)

  • 41. Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.
    Lubisich EB; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Pashova HI; Burton B;
    J Dent; 2011 Apr; 39(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 21256915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
    Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Attitudes of Greek dentists towards repair of conservative restorations. An online survey.
    Maria A; Charikleia P; Panagiotis L
    Int Dent J; 2017 Dec; 67(6):351-359. PubMed ID: 28736971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Provision of specific dental procedures by general dentists in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network: questionnaire findings.
    Gilbert GH; Gordan VV; Korelitz JJ; Fellows JL; Meyerowitz C; Oates TW; Rindal DB; Gregory RJ;
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jan; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25608862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in posterior teeth of young Finnish adults.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Dec; 60(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12512880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jan; 6(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 10752459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options.
    Janus C; Sbeih I; Best AM
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 22313920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Restorative treatment thresholds for interproximal primary caries based on radiographic images: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Garvan CW; Heft MW; Fellows JL; Qvist V; Rindal DB; Gilbert GH;
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(6):654-63; quiz 664-6, 595, 680. PubMed ID: 19906618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the dental structure loss produced during maintenance and replacement of occlusal amalgam restorations.
    Sardenberg F; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 18949310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. EVIDENCE-PRACTICE GAP IN TREATMENT DECISIONS ABOUT DEFECTIVE COMPOSITE AND AMALGAM RESTORATIONS AMONG BRAZILIAN DENTISTS.
    da Silva Tagliaferro EP; Riley JL; Gilbert GH; da Silva SRC; Rosell FL; Junior AV; Gordan VV
    Braz J Oral Sci; 2023; 22():. PubMed ID: 38077621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
    Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Blum IR; Frazier KB; Haisch LD; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22298557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
    Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Louis DR; Litaker MS; Minyé HM; Mungia R; Gordan VV; Marshall DG; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):882-890. PubMed ID: 27492046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations.
    Deligeorgi V; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2001 Jan; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11405031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.