179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22654620)
1. Diagnostic value of breast proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 1.5T in different histopathological types.
Baek HM
ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():508295. PubMed ID: 22654620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant and benign lesions using single-voxel proton MRS of the breast at 3 T MRI.
Suppiah S; Rahmat K; Mohd-Shah MN; Azlan CA; Tan LK; Aziz YF; Vijayananthan A; Wui AL; Yip CH
Clin Radiol; 2013 Sep; 68(9):e502-10. PubMed ID: 23706826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical relevance of total choline (tCho) quantification in suspicious lesions on multiparametric breast MRI.
Sodano C; Clauser P; Dietzel M; Kapetas P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Gussew A; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3371-3382. PubMed ID: 32065286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of MR spectroscopy for characterizing malignant breast lesions using a clinical 3-T scanner.
Baek HM; Lee YJ
Breast Cancer; 2015 Sep; 22(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 24390858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Mizukoshi W; Kozawa E; Inoue K; Saito N; Nishi N; Saeki T; Kimura F
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 22777619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status with total choline concentration and tumor volume in breast cancer patients: an MRI and in vivo proton MRS study.
Sah RG; Sharma U; Parshad R; Seenu V; Mathur SR; Jagannathan NR
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Oct; 68(4):1039-47. PubMed ID: 22213087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Montemezzi S; Cavedon C; Camera L; Meliadò G; Caumo F; Baglio I; Sardanelli F
Radiol Med; 2017 Mar; 122(3):161-170. PubMed ID: 27981485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Investigation of Single Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement MR Imaging in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions in a Sample of Iranian Women.
Faeghi F; Baniasadipour B; Jalalshokouhi J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8335-8. PubMed ID: 26745081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast lesions: an update.
Tse GM; Yeung DK; King AD; Cheung HS; Yang WT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 104(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 17051424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application value of 3T ¹H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosing breast tumors.
Vassiou K; Tsougos I; Kousi E; Vlychou M; Athanasiou E; Theodorou K; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):380-8. PubMed ID: 23436823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the breast at 3T: pre- and post-contrast evaluation for breast lesion characterization.
Kousi E; Tsougos I; Vasiou K; Theodorou K; Poultsidi A; Fezoulidis I; Kappas C
ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():754380. PubMed ID: 22645448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of diffusion weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in breast cancer patients with indeterminate dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Sharma U; Agarwal K; Hari S; Mathur SR; Seenu V; Parshad R; Jagannathan NR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 61():66-72. PubMed ID: 31128225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast using the total choline peak integral as a marker of malignancy.
Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Di Leo G; de Nijs R; Vorbuchner M; Podo F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1608-17. PubMed ID: 19457825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single voxel in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast lesions: experience in 77 cases.
Başara I; Örgüç Ş; Coşkun T
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 23271501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.
Sun K; Chai W; Fu C; Zhan Y; Shen K; Luo X; Yan F
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1565-74. PubMed ID: 26385807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 1H-MRS evaluation of breast lesions by using total choline signal-to-noise ratio as an indicator of malignancy: a meta-analysis.
Wang X; Wang XJ; Song HS; Chen LH
Med Oncol; 2015 May; 32(5):160. PubMed ID: 25895597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI and (1)H MRS of the breast: presence of a choline peak as malignancy marker is related to K21 value of the tumor in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Geraghty PR; van den Bosch MA; Spielman DM; Hunjan S; Birdwell RL; Fong KJ; Stables LA; Zakhour M; Herfkens RJ; Ikeda DM
Breast J; 2008; 14(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 19000051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evaluation of human breast lesions with magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Cecil KM; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Lenkinski RE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2001 Jul; 68(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 11678308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsy?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 19696300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of lipid metabolism by estimating the fat fraction in different breast tissues and in various breast tumor sub-types by in vivo
Agarwal K; Sharma U; Mathur S; Seenu V; Parshad R; Jagannathan NR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():116-122. PubMed ID: 29454110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
