These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22655089)

  • 1. Multimodal communication in a noisy environment: a case study of the Bornean rock frog Staurois parvus.
    Grafe TU; Preininger D; Sztatecsny M; Kasah R; Dehling JM; Proksch S; Hödl W
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37965. PubMed ID: 22655089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Androgen Receptor Modulates Multimodal Displays in the Bornean Rock Frog (Staurois parvus).
    Smith SM; Eigerman AR; LeCure KM; Kironde E; Privett-Mendoza AG; Fuxjager MJ; Preininger D; Mangiamele LA
    Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):221-230. PubMed ID: 34009301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Divergent receiver responses to components of multimodal signals in two foot-flagging frog species.
    Preininger D; Boeckle M; Sztatecsny M; Hödl W
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e55367. PubMed ID: 23383168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased androgenic sensitivity in the hind limb muscular system marks the evolution of a derived gestural display.
    Mangiamele LA; Fuxjager MJ; Schuppe ER; Taylor RS; Hödl W; Preininger D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 May; 113(20):5664-9. PubMed ID: 27143723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ontogenetic Change of Signal Brightness in the Foot-Flagging Frog Species
    Stangel J; Preininger D; Sztatecsny M; Hödl W
    Herpetologica; 2015 Mar; 71(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25983337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social regulation of androgenic hormones and gestural display behavior in a tropical frog.
    Love N; Preininger D; Fuxjager MJ
    Horm Behav; 2023 Sep; 155():105425. PubMed ID: 37683499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genome assembly of the foot-flagging frog, Staurois parvus: a resource for understanding mechanisms of behavior.
    Holtz MA; Racicot R; Preininger D; Stuckert AMM; Mangiamele LA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37625789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments].
    Zhang F; Chen P; Zhao SY
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Jun; 34(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 23775995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complex sensory environments alter mate choice outcomes.
    Taylor RC; Wilhite KO; Ludovici RJ; Mitchell KM; Halfwerk W; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Hunter KL
    J Exp Biol; 2021 Jan; 224(Pt 1):. PubMed ID: 33188061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arginine vasotocin injection increases probability of calling in cricket frogs, but causes call changes characteristic of less aggressive males.
    Marler CA; Chu J; Wilczynski W
    Horm Behav; 1995 Dec; 29(4):554-70. PubMed ID: 8748513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.
    Muñoz MI; Penna M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jul; 202(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 27209276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Kuczynski MC; Vélez A; Schwartz JJ; Bee MA
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Aug; 213(Pt 16):2840-50. PubMed ID: 20675554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Females and males respond differently to calls impaired by noise in a tree frog.
    Zhang H; Zhu B; Zhou Y; He Q; Sun X; Wang J; Cui J
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jul; 11(13):9159-9167. PubMed ID: 34257950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog.
    Arch VS; Grafe TU; Gridi-Papp M; Narins PM
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5413. PubMed ID: 19401782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
    Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male antiphonal calls and phonotaxis evoked by female courtship calls in the large odorous frog (Odorrana graminea).
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35939131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Call intercalation in dyadic interactions in natural choruses of Johnstone's whistling frog Eleutherodactylus johnstonei (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae).
    Tárano Z; Carballo L
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():55-63. PubMed ID: 26988233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs.
    Reichert MS; Höbel G
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2384-98. PubMed ID: 26282702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Receiver discriminability drives the evolution of complex sexual signals by sexual selection.
    Cui J; Song X; Zhu B; Fang G; Tang Y; Ryan MJ
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):922-7. PubMed ID: 26920078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.