These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22656409)
21. The effects of the period between biopsy and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging on cancer staging in localized prostate cancer. Park KK; Lee SH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Chung BH BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(8):1148-51. PubMed ID: 20346052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can saturation biopsy predict prostate cancer localization in radical prostatectomy specimens: a correlative study and implications for focal therapy. Falzarano SM; Zhou M; Hernandez AV; Moussa AS; Jones JS; Magi-Galluzzi C Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):682-7. PubMed ID: 20206973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database. Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL; J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy. Ruprecht O; Weisser P; Bodelle B; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):456-60. PubMed ID: 21354732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively? Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis. Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting unilateral prostate cancer based on biopsy features: implications for focal ablative therapy--results from the SEARCH database. Scales CD; Presti JC; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ; J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1249-52. PubMed ID: 17698131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prostate volume measured preoperatively predicts for organ-confined disease in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Bianco FJ; Mallah KN; Korets R; Hricak H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 17320675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins. Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinically significant prostate cancer local recurrence after radiation therapy occurs at the site of primary tumor: magnetic resonance imaging and step-section pathology evidence. Pucar D; Hricak H; Shukla-Dave A; Kuroiwa K; Drobnjak M; Eastham J; Scardino PT; Zelefsky MJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 17707266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Pucar D; Kuroiwa K; Chen HN; Spector J; Koutcher JA; Zakian KL; Scardino PT BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 17223922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]