145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2265842)
1. A comparison of four cytological sampling techniques in a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Nayagam M; Thin RN
Genitourin Med; 1990 Dec; 66(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 2265842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.
Hughes RG; Haddad NG; Smart GE; Colquhoun M; McGoogan E; MacIntyre CC; Prescott RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 99(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1637767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the size of extended, modified Ayre's spatula on endocervical cell yield in the postmenopausal women.
Parnpoonsarp W; Ploarsa P; Arpakorn V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 19702064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
Cannon JM; Blythe JG
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
Selvaggi SM; Malviya V
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
Neinstein LS; Church J; Akiyoshi T
J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
van Erp EJ; Dersjant-Roorda MC; Arentz NP; Stijnen T; Trimbos JB
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Oct; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2572484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality of the Pap smear.
Fokke HE; Salvatore CM; Schipper ME; Bleker OP
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1992; 13(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 1486925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sampling endocervical cells on cervical smears: a comparison of two instruments used in general practice. Cumbrian Practice Research Group.
Br J Gen Pract; 1991 May; 41(346):192-3. PubMed ID: 1817471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
