These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22658886)

  • 1. Assessing paternities with inconclusive STR results: The suitability of bi-allelic markers.
    Pinto N; Magalhães M; Conde-Sousa E; Gomes C; Pereira R; Alves C; Gusmão L; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Jan; 7(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 22658886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs.
    Amorim A; Pereira L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 May; 150(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15837005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of alternative batteries of genetic markers to complement autosomal STRs in kinship investigations: autosomal indels vs. X-chromosome STRs.
    Gomes C; Magalhães M; Alves C; Amorim A; Pinto N; Gusmão L
    Int J Legal Med; 2012 Nov; 126(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 22940765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.
    Tillmar AO; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():128-33. PubMed ID: 25113577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complex kinship analysis with a combination of STRs, SNPs, and indels.
    Zhang Q; Wang X; Cheng P; Yang S; Li W; Zhou Z; Wang S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102749. PubMed ID: 35939875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of SNPs as Supplementary Markers in a Paternity Case with 3 Genetic Incompatibilities at Autosomal and Y Chromosomal Loci.
    Lindner I; von Wurmb-Schwark N; Meier P; Fimmers R; Büttner A
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2014 Apr; 41(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 24847187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Forensic application of two short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphic markers, FES and HUMTH01].
    Tamura A; Tsuji H; Suzuki K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Aug; 50(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 8810746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reinvestigations of six unusual paternity cases by typing of autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Børsting C; Morling N
    Transfusion; 2012 Feb; 52(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 21790631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining autosomal and Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat data in paternity testing with male child: methods and application.
    Ayadi I; Mahfoudh-Lahiani N; Makni H; Ammar-Keskes L; Rebaï A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1068-72. PubMed ID: 17645485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inference of maternal uniparental disomy of the entire chromosome 2 from a paternity test.
    Guzmán-Alberto JC; Martínez-Cortes G; Rangel-Villalobos H
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jan; 133(1):71-75. PubMed ID: 29511852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Kinship determination using DNA markers].
    Jorquera G H; Acuña P M; Cifuentes L L
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Feb; 136(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18483673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutations and/or close relatives? Six case work examples where 49 autosomal SNPs were used as supplementary markers.
    Børsting C; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 20457095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternal exclusion: allele sharing in microsatellite testing.
    Narkuti V; Vellanki RN; Oraganti NM; Mangamoori LN
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(11):1586-8. PubMed ID: 19012523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing exclusionary power of a paternity test involving a pair of alleged grandparents.
    Scarpetta MA; Staub RW; Einum DD
    Transfusion; 2007 Feb; 47(2):335-40. PubMed ID: 17302781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving complex kinship analyses with additional STR loci.
    Carboni I; Iozzi S; Nutini AL; Torricelli F; Ricci U
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3145-51. PubMed ID: 25113633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Chromosome STR genetic markers in paternity identification].
    Li J
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Aug; 29(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 16134597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA analysis in disputed parentage: the occurrence of two apparently false exclusions of paternity, both at short tandem repeat (STR) loci, in the one child.
    Gunn PR; Trueman K; Stapleton P; Klarkowski DB
    Electrophoresis; 1997 Aug; 18(9):1650-2. PubMed ID: 9378139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of the SNPforID 52 SNP-plex assay in paternity testing.
    Børsting C; Sanchez JJ; Hansen HE; Hansen AJ; Bruun HQ; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19083839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.