277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22659482)
1. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain.
Schweser F; Sommer K; Deistung A; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2083-100. PubMed ID: 22659482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors.
Wen Y; Wang Y; Liu T
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Feb; 75(2):823-30. PubMed ID: 25752805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.
Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using the Multiple Dipole-inversion Combination with k-space Segmentation Method.
Sato R; Shirai T; Taniguchi Y; Murase T; Bito Y; Ochi H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):340-350. PubMed ID: 28367904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward online reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility maps: superfast dipole inversion.
Schweser F; Deistung A; Sommer K; Reichenbach JR
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1582-94. PubMed ID: 22791625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range.
Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C
NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength.
Deistung A; Schäfer A; Schweser F; Biedermann U; Turner R; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():299-314. PubMed ID: 23036448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?
Schweser F; Deistung A; Lehr BW; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(4):2789-807. PubMed ID: 21040794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods.
Wharton S; Bowtell R
Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):515-25. PubMed ID: 20615474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Li W; Wang N; Yu F; Han H; Cao W; Romero R; Tantiwongkosi B; Duong TQ; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():111-22. PubMed ID: 25536496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-Echo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) Imaging.
Gharabaghi S; Liu S; Wang Y; Chen Y; Buch S; Jokar M; Wischgoll T; Kashou NH; Zhang C; Wu B; Cheng J; Haacke EM
Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():581474. PubMed ID: 33192267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging.
Liu T; Liu J; de Rochefort L; Spincemaille P; Khalidov I; Ledoux JR; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 21465541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parallel-transmission-enabled magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging of the human brain at 7 T.
Cloos MA; Boulant N; Luong M; Ferrand G; Giacomini E; Hang MF; Wiggins CJ; Le Bihan D; Amadon A
Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):2140-50. PubMed ID: 22659484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
