These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22659482)

  • 21. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Yao Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2795-2803. PubMed ID: 29023982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Susceptibility phase imaging with comparison to R2 mapping of iron-rich deep grey matter.
    Walsh AJ; Wilman AH
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jul; 57(2):452-61. PubMed ID: 21513807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging.
    Andersson JL; Skare S; Ashburner J
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):870-88. PubMed ID: 14568458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chaos and COSMOS-Considerations on QSM methods with multiple and single orientations and effects from local anisotropy.
    Gkotsoulias DG; Jäger C; Müller R; Gräßle T; Olofsson KM; Møller T; Unwin S; Crockford C; Wittig RM; Bilgic B; Möller HE
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 110():104-111. PubMed ID: 38631534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robust breast quantitative susceptibility mapping in the presence of silicone.
    Böhm C; Stelter JK; Weiss K; Meineke J; Komenda A; Borde T; Makowski MR; Fallenberg EM; Karampinos DC
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Sep; 90(3):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 37125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility mapping via improved ℓ
    Cai C; Chen X; Liu W; Cai S; Zeng D; Ding X
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Dec; 79():59-67. PubMed ID: 27744181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Model resolution-based deconvolution for improved quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Mathew RS; Paluru N; Yalavarthy PK
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Feb; 37(2):e5055. PubMed ID: 37803940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. QSMART: Quantitative susceptibility mapping artifact reduction technique.
    Yaghmaie N; Syeda WT; Wu C; Zhang Y; Zhang TD; Burrows EL; Brodtmann A; Moffat BA; Wright DK; Glarin R; Kolbe S; Johnston LA
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117701. PubMed ID: 33484853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using Structural Feature Based Collaborative Reconstruction (SFCR) in the Human Brain.
    Bao L; Li X; Cai C; Chen Z; van Zijl PC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2040-50. PubMed ID: 27019480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A modulated closed form solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping--a thorough evaluation and comparison to iterative methods based on edge prior knowledge.
    Khabipova D; Wiaux Y; Gruetter R; Marques JP
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():163-174. PubMed ID: 25463463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI.
    Liu T; Xu W; Spincemaille P; Avestimehr AS; Wang Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 22231170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multi-echo dipole inversion for magnetic susceptibility mapping.
    Kames C; Doucette J; Rauscher A
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2391-2401. PubMed ID: 36695283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fast nonlinear susceptibility inversion with variational regularization.
    Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Acosta-Cabronero J; Tejos C
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Aug; 80(2):814-821. PubMed ID: 29322560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incomplete spectrum QSM using support information.
    Fuchs P; Shmueli K
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1130524. PubMed ID: 37139523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using magnetic field simulation to study susceptibility-related phase contrast in gradient echo MRI.
    Schäfer A; Wharton S; Gowland P; Bowtell R
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 48(1):126-37. PubMed ID: 19520176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noise Effects in Various Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Methods.
    Wang S; Liu T; Chen W; Spincemaille P; Wisnieff C; Tsiouris AJ; Zhu W; Pan C; Zhao L; Wang Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 60(12):3441-8. PubMed ID: 23751950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
    Ahn HS; Park SH; Ye JC
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Mar; 83(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 31468595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Plug-and-Play latent feature editing for orientation-adaptive quantitative susceptibility mapping neural networks.
    Gao Y; Xiong Z; Shan S; Liu Y; Rong P; Li M; Wilman AH; Pike GB; Liu F; Sun H
    Med Image Anal; 2024 May; 94():103160. PubMed ID: 38552528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preconditioned water-fat total field inversion: Application to spine quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Boehm C; Sollmann N; Meineke J; Ruschke S; Dieckmeyer M; Weiss K; Zimmer C; Makowski MR; Baum T; Karampinos DC
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jan; 87(1):417-430. PubMed ID: 34255370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
    Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.