These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22659551)

  • 1. Specifying the correlation structure in inverse-probability- weighting estimation for repeated measures.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Glymour MM; Weuve J; Robins J
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jul; 23(4):644-6. PubMed ID: 22659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited commentary: G-computation--lost in translation?
    Vansteelandt S; Keiding N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 21415028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to invited commentary. Rose et al. respond to "G-computation and standardization in epidemiology".
    Rose S; Snowden JM; Mortimer KM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):743-4. PubMed ID: 21415030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Application of Inverse Probability Weighting Estimation of Marginal Structural Models of a Continuous Exposure: Benzodiazepines and Delirium.
    Hazelbag CM; Zaal IJ; Devlin JW; Gatto NM; Hoes AW; Slooter AJ; Groenwold RH
    Epidemiology; 2015 Sep; 26(5):e52-3. PubMed ID: 26134348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of error-in-confounders on the estimation of the causal parameter when using marginal structural models and inverse probability-of-treatment weights: a simulation study.
    Regier MD; Moodie EE; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 24445244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cautionary note concerning the use of stabilized weights in marginal structural models.
    Talbot D; Atherton J; Rossi AM; Bacon SL; Lefebvre G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):812-23. PubMed ID: 25410264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the Subtleties of Inverse Probability Weighting and Marginal Structural Models.
    Breskin A; Cole SR; Westreich D
    Epidemiology; 2018 May; 29(3):352-355. PubMed ID: 29384789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative falsification of instrumental variables assumption using balance measures.
    Ali MS; Uddin MJ; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Roes KC; Klungel OH
    Epidemiology; 2014 Sep; 25(5):770-2. PubMed ID: 25076152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
    Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variable selection for propensity score estimation via balancing covariates.
    Zhu Y; Schonbach M; Coffman DL; Williams JS
    Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):e14-5. PubMed ID: 25643109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.
    Sato T; Matsuyama Y
    Epidemiology; 2003 Nov; 14(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 14569183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the causal effect of zidovudine on CD4 count with a marginal structural model for repeated measures.
    Hernán MA; Brumback BA; Robins JM
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1689-709. PubMed ID: 12111906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of random coefficient regression in accounting for residual confounding.
    Gustafson P; Greenland S
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):760-8. PubMed ID: 16984318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An introduction to g methods.
    Naimi AI; Cole SR; Kennedy EH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):756-762. PubMed ID: 28039382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal relationship and confounding in statistical models.
    Ranstam J; Cook JA
    Br J Surg; 2016 Oct; 103(11):1445-6. PubMed ID: 27654647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of attributable fractions using inverse probability weighting.
    Sjölander A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):415-28. PubMed ID: 20223785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
    Frank Liu G; Zhan X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts' judgment.
    Arimone Y; Bégaud B; Miremont-Salamé G; Fourrier-Réglat A; Molimard M; Moore N; Haramburu F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16488362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.