These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22659551)

  • 21. A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts' judgment.
    Arimone Y; Bégaud B; Miremont-Salamé G; Fourrier-Réglat A; Molimard M; Moore N; Haramburu F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16488362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Weighting regressions by propensity scores.
    Freedman DA; Berk RA
    Eval Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(4):392-409. PubMed ID: 18591709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sources of error in clinical research.
    Kumar R; Kumar S
    Indian Pediatr; 1996 Dec; 33(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 9141804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.
    Vansteelandt S; Bekaert M; Claeskens G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 21075803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating controlled direct effects in the presence of intermediate confounding of the mediator-outcome relationship: Comparison of five different methods.
    Lepage B; Dedieu D; Savy N; Lang T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Apr; 25(2):553-70. PubMed ID: 23070596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting.
    Schmoor C; Gall C; Stampf S; Graf E
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):369-87. PubMed ID: 21308726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simulation-based evaluation of methods to estimate the impact of an adverse event on hospital length of stay.
    Samore MH; Shen S; Greene T; Stoddard G; Sauer B; Shinogle J; Nebeker J; Harbarth S
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S108-15. PubMed ID: 17909368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The language of epidemiology (XV): Biases in case-control studies.
    Aronson SM
    R I Med; 1993 Jan; 76(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 8428032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.
    Mallinckrodt CH; Clark WS; David SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 11459446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multilevel modeling and model averaging.
    Greenland S
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1999; 25 Suppl 4():43-8. PubMed ID: 10628440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].
    Touzet S; Colin C
    Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimating causal parameters without target populations.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Oct; 13(5):814-6. PubMed ID: 17824877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maximum likelihood estimation for incomplete repeated-measures experiments under an ARMA covariance structure.
    Rochon J; Helms RW
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 2655730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A positive or a negative confounding variable? A simple teaching aid for clinicians and students.
    Mehio-Sibai A; Feinleib M; Sibai TA; Armenian HK
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 15(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 15967387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal structural models might overcome confounding when analyzing multiple treatment effects in observational studies.
    Suarez D; Haro JM; Novick D; Ochoa S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 18471655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating causal effects.
    Maldonado G; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 11980807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How statistics can be used to promote better health care.
    Sinclair J
    Nurs Times; 1999 Jun 23-29; 95(25):44-6. PubMed ID: 10497591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeated measures estimation of measurement bias for self-reported drug use with applications to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.
    Biemer PP; Witt M
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 167():439-76. PubMed ID: 9243573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.