147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22661047)
1. Comparison of four reconstructive methods for diaphyseal defects of the humerus after tumor resection.
Sakellariou VI; Mavrogenis AF; Babis GC; Soucacos PN; Magnissalis EA; Papagelopoulos PJ
J Appl Biomech; 2012 Nov; 28(5):568-78. PubMed ID: 22661047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Intercalary Prosthesis for Humeral Diaphyseal Segmental Defect Reconstruction.
Zhao LM; Tian DM; Wei Y; Zhang JH; Di ZL; He ZY; Hu YC
Orthop Surg; 2018 Feb; 10(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29484857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of humeral diaphyseal segmental defect fixation.
Henry JC; Damron TA; Weiner MM; Higgins ME; Werner FW; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Mar; (396):231-9. PubMed ID: 11859248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.
Benevenia J; Kirchner R; Patterson F; Beebe K; Wirtz DC; Rivero S; Palma M; Friedrich MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 26475032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of segmental prosthesis reconstruction for diaphyseal bone tumors: a multi-center retrospective study.
Zheng K; Yu XC; Hu YC; Shao ZW; Xu M; Wang BC; Wang F
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):638. PubMed ID: 31253134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intercalary allograft augmented with intramedullary cement and plate fixation is a reliable solution after resection of a diaphyseal tumour.
Gupta S; Kafchinski LA; Gundle KR; Saidi K; Griffin AM; Wunder JS; Ferguson PC
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jul; 99-B(7):973-978. PubMed ID: 28663406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation and treatment of metastases to the humerus.
Frassica FJ; Frassica DA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Oct; (415 Suppl):S212-8. PubMed ID: 14600613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Humeral metastasis of renal cancer: Surgical options and review of literature.
Casadei R; Drago G; Di Pressa F; Donati D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Jun; 104(4):533-538. PubMed ID: 29654934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques.
Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails.
Erden T; Kapicioglu M; Demirtas A; Bilsel K; Akpinar F; Kuduz H
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 Nov; 53(6):490-496. PubMed ID: 31562026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstruction of Humeral Shaft Defect with an Intercalary Endoprosthesis Following Resection of Tumor.
Zhang JF; Wang F; Hu YC
Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):281-284. PubMed ID: 30073780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plate-prosthesis composite reconstruction after large segmental resection of proximal humeral tumors: A retrospective comparative study.
Wei R; Guo W; Yang R; Tang X; Yang Y; Ji T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(22):e15787. PubMed ID: 31145303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of the intramedullary diaphyseal segmental defect fixation system for bone tumors.
Ruggieri P; Mavrogenis AF; Bianchi G; Sakellariou VI; Mercuri M; Papagelopoulos PJ
J Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 104(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 21381038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments.
Panagopoulos GN; Mavrogenis AF; Mauffrey C; Lesenský J; Angelini A; Megaloikonomos PD; Igoumenou VG; Papanastassiou J; Savvidou O; Ruggieri P; Papagelopoulos PJ
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Aug; 27(6):737-746. PubMed ID: 28585185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative biomechanical study on different fixation techniques in the management of transverse metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the distal humerus in children.
Kamara A; Ji X; Liu T; Zhan Y; Li J; Wang E
Int Orthop; 2019 Feb; 43(2):411-416. PubMed ID: 29744649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.
Foruria AM; Carrascal MT; Revilla C; Munuera L; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 20153916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical performance of flexible intramedullary nails with end caps tested in distal segmental defects of pediatric femur models.
Volpon JB; Perina MM; Okubo R; Maranho DA
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 22706460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Twenty nine shoulder reconstructions after resection of the proximal humerus for neoplasm with mean 7-year follow-up].
Kassab M; Dumaine V; Babinet A; Ouaknine M; Tomeno B; Anract P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2005 Feb; 91(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15791187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: surgical technique.
Abdeen A; Healey JH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():188-96. PubMed ID: 20844174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A biomechanical comparison of locking plate and locking nail implants used for fractures of the proximal humerus.
Kitson J; Booth G; Day R
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 17368924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
